Comparing Terrex with Stryker like compare durain with apple
-
For e ATGM version is e launcher stowed internally or mounted externally?
-
Originally posted by spartan_6:
For e ATGM version is e launcher stowed internally or mounted externally?
Not sure.From the pics,it looks like internal.
2.Great.
Greater power, payload and protection----"LAV-H is a further development of the Canadian LAV-III APC and Stryker ICV but is longer, has more internal volume and a gross vehicle weight of 25 tonnes including crew, weapons and survivability improvements."
http://www.janes.com/events/exhibitions/idex2009/sections/daily/day4/greater-power-payload-and.shtml
LAV III - LAV Replacement - LAV Rebuild - Light Armoured Vehicle ...
-
General Dynamics Unveils the LAV H High-Capacity Technology ...
-
,,,,m...
-
General Dynamics News - October 5, 2007 -
美通用動力展出高性能輕型�甲車近似斯特賴克
Is LAV-H to replace Stryker?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2015229/posts?page=27
-
http://www.casr.ca/bg-vehicles.htm
-
Terrex can gove NBC protections!
2.Can anyone tell me how USA Strykers can carry out mission in flooded areas
when it cannot swim?
http://www.stengg.com/CoyCapPro/listing.aspx?pdtypeid=1
http://www.stengg.com/upload/920fO1gS8hPSSObHe4Y.pdf
Brochure Video -
I cant believe that Strykers
"that it was less capable than either the M113A3 or the Bradley because it lacked an amphibious capability."
I think some of US army regreted that Yankees did not pick up the only wheeled
APC in the MAV selection-Medium Armored Vehivles.
Medium Armored Vehicle (MAV)-- Strykes was selected.
In the 4 finalist of MAV selection,there is only one wheeled and the only non--American APC .Few dozen of APC joined the bidding.
Bionix Infantry Fighting Vehicle is the one!!
Strykers won.The rest is history..
A renewed debate occurred, for example, over the effectiveness of tracked versus wheeled combat vehicles. Commentators compared the Stryker’s performance with that of the M113A3. Critics claimed that the wheeled infantry carrier version was too lightly armed when compared to similar vehicles fielded by other armies and that it was less capable than either the M113A3 or the Bradley because it lacked an amphibious capability.
The Army spent considerable time and effort answering negative reports, pointing out that heavier weaponry such as the 25-mm. turret
page 11Mark J. Reardon. 2007. From transformation to combat : the first Stryker brigade at war .
http://www.history.army.mil/brochures/Stryker/Stryker.pdf
From "TransFormaTion To CombaT--The First stryker brigade at War
by
Mark J. Reardon
Jeffery A. Charlston
Center of Military History
United States Army
Washington, D.C., 2007inspied by this
http://www.flickr.com/photos/24207558@N05/2330333758/
,mmmm
-
I cant believe that Strykers--wrong posting
-
wrong post