I think abt the same time but they are 2 different system.Originally posted by tek_koh:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPvKty6tdPs
The Dragon 120mm Mortar comapred to our 120mm Super Rapid
The US claim they have a break through
and Singapore claim it is self developed
So, which comes first?
Then perhaps we can compete for any possible future contract just like what we did with the BX and Ultimax. Hopefully politics won't prevail over actual capability of the products.Originally posted by gary1910:I think abt the same time but they are 2 different system.
For example , our SRAMS has max rate of fire 18rds per min whereas the Dragon system only 10 rds per min , that is due to STK 's patented cooling system which yield this higher rate of fire.
Our SRAMS also has the world lowest recoil of less than 20tons plus it only weight 1200kg which enable it to be mounted on a very light weight 4x4 like the HUMVEE and Spider LSV.
So can Dragon system or any other mortar system do that?
I dun think so!
http://www.stengg.com/upload/620JKKP6Y94P4nl3aZf.pdf
In fact , based on the above , our SRAMS is much better than the Dragon system.
AFAIK, SRAMS has already make a sales of 48 system to UAE.Originally posted by tankee1981:Then perhaps we can compete for any possible future contract just like what we did with the BX and Ultimax. Hopefully politics won't prevail over actual capability of the products.
If only...Originally posted by tek_koh:they cant afford to fly to Singapore to flim ma
1.can u cal this one future weaponsOriginally posted by Daniel-Lim:Unfortunately, STK weapons have not made a single debut on FUTURE WEAPONS. They featured the ordinary LWRC IAR and called it " revolutionary ".
And now the Dragon as if the US invented this?
Youtube video available. Just search for LWRC IAR.Originally posted by lionnoisy:2.LWRC IAR---pl explain.
its jus propaganda of western military mights..Originally posted by Daniel-Lim:Unfortunately, STK weapons have not made a single debut on FUTURE WEAPONS. They featured the ordinary LWRC IAR and called it " revolutionary ".
And now the Dragon as if the US invented this?
Thanks, thats good news! A little step forward...Originally posted by gary1910:AFAIK, SRAMS has already make a sales of 48 system to UAE.
it not who started first that count.. but who finished the development first thats important....Originally posted by tankfanatic:the dragon fire dev started in 1997...so the SRAMS start when?
Actually I feel that this program quite pro-US.. so not surprizing that they only featured their own home made stuffs..Originally posted by Daniel-Lim:Unfortunately, STK weapons have not made a single debut on FUTURE WEAPONS. They featured the ordinary LWRC IAR and called it " revolutionary ".
And now the Dragon as if the US invented this?
ok so who finish first?Originally posted by tripwire:it not who started first that count.. but who finished the development first thats important....
the germans started the rocket... but its the americans that landed on the moon.
but frankly..i have no idea when SRAMS started development... afterall... since when did DSTA and DSO ever announce all the project in public?
Fully automatic , so what?Originally posted by tankfanatic:anyway the dragon fire were fully autonomous and automatic...while the SRAM were semi auto ...please correct me if im wrong.
while the SRAM were clocked to have a maximum 18 round per minutes....it is quoted somewhere (i think in wiki) that 10 round is the correct number...the 18 round record can only be achieve in a sustained firing . (correct me again if im wrong)
The SRAMS brochure is very strange. In the first part, they quote 10rdm then in the later part where they list the specification, it is listed as 18rdm.Originally posted by tankfanatic:anyway the dragon fire were fully autonomous and automatic...while the SRAM were semi auto ...please correct me if im wrong.
while the SRAM were clocked to have a maximum 18 round per minutes....it is quoted somewhere (i think in wiki) that 10 round is the correct number...the 18 round record can only be achieve in a sustained firing . (correct me again if im wrong)