Sukhoi SU - 30!Originally posted by LRRP:Off tangent a bit..
F5 replacement. Would you like to see Typhoon or F35?
Personally, I prefer the Typhoon. RSAF is getting too Americanised.
Actually i also prefer Russian planes such as the Su-30 and maybe the future PAK-FA but its very unlikely for us to get their aircraft.Originally posted by Lance_han:Sukhoi SU - 30!
It is intentional, to a certain extent. All about interoperatibility.Originally posted by LRRP:Off tangent a bit..
F5 replacement. Would you like to see Typhoon or F35?
Personally, I prefer the Typhoon. RSAF is getting too Americanised.
Is it really that bad? I remember Russian equipment had some extent of interoperability with their american counterparts. Or maybe we should try adapting Western weapons and avionics with russian technology, like japan and her MIGs?Originally posted by LazerLordz:It is intentional, to a certain extent. All about interoperatibility.
I wouldn't touch Russian equipment, not because of their lack of quality, but the effort to overhaul the entire logistics system would be a waste of time.
Japan have Migs? As far as i know, the only time they did 'have' Migs is when the Soviet pilots defected with their planes such as MIG-25 IN 1976.Originally posted by Lance_han:Is it really that bad? I remember Russian equipment had some extent of interoperability with their american counterparts. Or maybe we should try adapting Western weapons and avionics with russian technology, like japan and her MIGs?
I'm saying you would have to add a totally new logistics supply chain etc.Originally posted by Lance_han:Is it really that bad? I remember Russian equipment had some extent of interoperability with their american counterparts. Or maybe we should try adapting Western weapons and avionics with russian technology, like japan and her MIGs?
Ground those 2 pilots! They've insufficient distance seperation between aircraft in formation take off!Originally posted by Blockhead:Yup, the F-15s are back to flying in Japan!
Ok, seriously, I just wanted to share this pic but couldn't find anywhere else to put it up. Wait, they remotely look like f-15s, so may be not totally unrelated, right?
Originally posted by duotiga83:http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2007/12/05/220089/usaf-f-15s-remain-grounded-as-more-cracks-found.html
Grounding of the F-15s continues to be used by US Air Force leadership to underline its need for additional funding to continue procurement of the Lockheed Martin F-22A beyond the planned 183 aircraft.
Oh I wun be doing that. Those are just the aerial acrobatic team doing their stuntsOriginally posted by Shotgun:Ground those 2 pilots! They've insufficient distance seperation between aircraft in formation take off!
.Officials stand down F-15 A-D models until further notice
US Air Force | Dec 6, 2007
Digg this | Send Article | Print this | Discuss this
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE, Va: The commander of Air Combat Command directed the stand-down Dec. 3 of all ACC F-15 A through D model aircraft until further notice.
The decision follows additional information received from the ongoing investigation of the Nov. 2 F-15C mishap that resulted in the loss of that aircraft.
Gen. John D.W. Corley, ACC commander, also recommended the grounding of all other A through D model aircraft in other Air Force major commands, including those under the operational control of U.S. combatant commanders.
Monday's findings from the accident investigation board indicate that a recently discovered defect may be more extensive and found in more aircraft than initially thought. These findings, based on a metallurgical analysis of the mishap aircraft, continue to focus on the F-15's upper longerons near the canopy of the aircraft. Additional cracks have been discovered in these longerons. The longerons are major structural components that run along the length and side of the aircraft.
Technical experts with the Warner Robins Air Logistics Center at Robins Air Force Base, Ga., are developing a specific inspection technique for the suspect area based on the recent findings. However, unlike previous inspections, the inspected aircraft will not be immediately returned to flight.
The duration of the stand-down is pending. Aircraft will not be returned to operational status until the F-15 A-D model findings and data have been analyzed, required inspections have been accomplished and the necessary repair or mitigation actions have been completed.
Computer simulations have indicated a catastrophic structural failure could result from cracks in the longerons. To date, longeron cracks have been discovered in an additional four aircraft. These aircraft are awaiting further engineering instructions before they are returned to operational status.
Air Combat Command officials continue to work with those in the Air National Guard, the Air Force Reserve and sister major commands in Europe and the Pacific, as well as with joint and coalition partners, to ensure mission coverage.The stand-down does not affect the F-15E Strike Eagle
The Japanese F-15 are of the much earlier models while ours are top of the line new aircraft so there is a difference my friend...Originally posted by audiovideo:lately keep reading about the japanese wanting to replace their old F4 and F15.....that makes me wonder why are we getting the F15....
if i am not wrong the japanese operated the F15 even before the Iseralis...Originally posted by audiovideo:lately keep reading about the japanese wanting to replace their old F4 and F15.....that makes me wonder why are we getting the F15....
wrong assumption.....Israel is the 1st F-15 operator outside of USA.......Originally posted by spencer99:if i am not wrong the japanese operated the F15 even before the Iseralis...