they stopped using for some time wot...Originally posted by SpKCb:Any know the current state of the ultimax drum magazines being phased out because they are too unreliable, heavy or because they require special tools to reload? Can anyone in the mil. chime in?
actually can...but after abt 50 rounds.....the spring resistance very strong already...hard to pushOriginally posted by senate077:yup, it's only for use during war time. during training,on one will be able to hand load these drum mags like a normal mag.
Yes the M-16 magazines have to be drilled with two holes to allow the mag to be attached properly to the magazine well. I wonder with the introduction of SAR-21, is there any plans to introduce the SAR-21 mag into the ultimax100?Originally posted by SpKCb:according to the wiki page about the ultimax it says
"However, because the Ultimax 100 uses a different magazine catch from the M16, the magazines must be modified by drilling two holes on the left hand lip. The drum magazine is great for sustained fire, but can be reloaded only with the help of external tools because of its powerful internal springs. Due to this impracticality, the drum magazine is largely phased out of service in the Singapore Armed Forces.[citation needed]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimax
I was just wondering if this was true or not.
i seriously doubt they'll change it to a polymer magazine.Originally posted by equlus84:Yes the M-16 magazines have to be drilled with two holes to allow the mag to be attached properly to the magazine well. I wonder with the introduction of SAR-21, is there any plans to introduce the SAR-21 mag into the ultimax100?
i see, but why ST doesnt adopt these ideas instead?Originally posted by davechng:Russian 75 round drum magazine for the RPK is differnt from our Ultimax 100! it has a latch in front of the mag that aids loading .. depressing the latch depress the spring and thus you can drop 4 to 5 rd in with no spring tension! than when that is done, you depress the latch and so on and so for.
IT works but after 75 rd! you get quite a soar thumb!
The CHinese AK drum is better ! you open the backside of the drum and drop all the rounds , 75 or 100 rd depending on the type.... and than close the back cover .. crank the spring to get the tension and rock and roll.
DaveC!
It is good, almost never jam and will work in dirty condition - due to the strong spring system. That is why it cannot be hand loaded as the spring is too strong for hand loadingOriginally posted by SpKCb:As for the ultimax drum, how often does it jam? How reliable is it in general, or in dirty conditions?
u must know who calls the shot 1stOriginally posted by FG42:i see, but why ST doesnt adopt these ideas instead?
I'm sure we have drums of them pre-loaded to be distributed in times of war. Probably in deep storage now or smthOriginally posted by SpecOps87:What I don't get is..why can't the a crank be used to set the spring to tension? Ultimax is supposed to be SAW (Section Automatic Weapon) it often ends up being SBW (Section Burst Weapon) as gunners are told to fire in short bursts...sheesh.
there is more than meet the eyeOriginally posted by Shotgun:I'm sure we have drums of them pre-loaded to be distributed in times of war. Probably in deep storage now or smth
Well... it is expensive to incorporate all these features into the design! I still think it is not a good idea not to be able to hand load your drum!?? espeically when you are resupplied,! it may come in ammo boxes or stripper like the NATO or US bandoleers!Originally posted by FG42:i see, but why ST doesnt adopt these ideas instead?