Originally posted by SingaporeTyrannosaur:
You ought to read the story behind it, that VC dude did some rather nasty personal things to the guy pulling the trigger, if I was the shooter, I am not sure if I would have been able to control myself back then.
WHAT?
What "nasty personal things"? Like slept with his wife etc?
The shooter had barely set eyes on the victim for more than one second before shooting him.
This shooting is not just a famous stills picture but also available as a film footage on most Vietnam War documentaries. We were shown this documentary during the initial part of recruit days.
Here's the story:
The shooter is a ARVN high-ranking officer. He's out on the streets/battle zone directing people while being filmed. He had just come direct from home because this was the Tet Offensive and the streets of Saigon was suddenly a battle zone. This may explain why he was armed with a small personal snub-nosed revolver.
A trooper drags the suspect to the officer and said that he is a VC saboteur. Without a single word, the officer drew his revolver and shoots the suspect in the temple.
All in a matter of 2 seconds without ceremony or questioning.
The VC suspect falls sideways down as blood spurts out of the entry wound.
The victim is NOT A CONFIRMED VC as far as most people were concerned- as he was never even questioned before being shot dead.
THAT's WHY, this picture helped turn public opinion against the war.
(Actually it was the film footage but a stills picture is easier to icon-ize.)
The Napalm Girl picture also helped turned public opinion against the war. Both pictures showed how much more harm US involvement is doing.
There was a story more than 10 years ago about the Napalm Girl and ARVN officer. They were both living in the US. I think the ARVN officer owned a restaurant.