If You Could Own Just One Weapon
-
Thought Amplifier.
It amplifies your thought. Someone fires his HMG at you. You think of a 1million mega watts shield, and deflected all his rounds. You think of a 300,000 volts charge rusty nail (cos the nail is on the ground) and let loose towards your enemy. -
Hmm...spining really can accelerate the balls to that speed?Originally posted by SingaporeTyrannosaur:LOL, it's neither of these things that you mentioned... from what we know so far at least.
Why speculate when you can find some facts?
http://www.defensereview.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=539
And of course, some interesting talk in regards to the "recoil" of the system. The person pitching for the weapon in the main article makes some dodgy physics mumbo jumbo though.
-
HEATOriginally posted by SingaporeTyrannosaur:Armbrust you fire real HEAT or sub-caliber?
The sub-caliber has significant recoil, but the HEAT for all purposes works very well in being soft launch.
If you want to know what the recoil truly is like... try firing an 84 or Armbrust with the recoil soaking features disabled... and you will immediately understand the difference that their recoil-less features make.
If you survive that is.
84 and LAW recoiless my foot
-
I want a F-22 ....
-
I have said it before I will say it again. Lenz's law in which alternating magnetic fields produce a force is a "action reaction pair". If you take 2 coils facing each other with an alternating current, each will experience a force. Although it is different for superconducting coils, there will always be some degree of force on the track.Originally posted by maggot:I think it's magnetic repulsion or near those maglev theories or else how to shot so far with no flash? Rail or gauss got that visible plasma trails after the rounds
In this case, the rails are mounted firmly onto the ground and thus the force is mostly on the train. -
i would like to own the world biggest armour vehicle
so i can scrape it and sell as i am broke now.
-
Why scrap it when you simply go crush some govt and rule that country as a military dictator?Originally posted by Quiet Guy:i would like to own the world biggest armour vehicle
so i can scrape it and sell as i am broke now. -
You gotta know what it is before you can own it.Originally posted by wonderamazement:I'd also love to own a nice lil' weapon of wooing girls...
-
i am not a leader, i am a follower, when the leader fell, i follow up and take overOriginally posted by Fingolfin_Noldor:Why scrap it when you simply go crush some govt and rule that country as a military dictator?
Peace on this land -
Reminds me of a guy who built one and destroys the whole town in revengeOriginally posted by Quiet Guy:i would like to own the world biggest armour vehicle
so i can scrape it and sell as i am broke now. -
I prefer to have mind control ability..
If you have that ability, you can control the mind of the powerful people who in turn get people to do your bidding.
Better than having special weapons, right? -
Who?Originally posted by maggot:Reminds me of a guy who built one and destroys the whole town in revenge -
The one in US that puts armour on his trailer and whack the whole townOriginally posted by wonderamazement:Who?
Forgot the name -
It was a bulldozer. He essentially armoured his bulldozer with concrete or somethng and he went round tearing people's houses, and a factory I think before he shot himself.Originally posted by maggot:The one in US that puts armour on his trailer and whack the whole town
Forgot the name -
Sigh, when you rely on feelings then at the very least don't trying to come up with any physics for them.Originally posted by maggot:HEAT
84 and LAW recoiless my foot
Maybe you are just a poor shooter for the Armbrust... workman blaming the tools? I did not experience "excessive" recoil in my experience with the Armbrust and neither did I miss my target.
And yes, you certainly have no idea about the actual recoil the 84 actually cuts out with it's Recoiless action.
Do the math and your talk is kinda empty.
You are starting to sound like the BMT recruits who make a lot of talk about how the recoil of their 5.56mm M-16 is high and causing them all kinds of problems like shoulder pain and cannot aim. -
Sigh, not wanting to do your researching and wanting to believe in "recoiless" magnetic repulsion or near those maglev theories that you don't even understand that violate the laws of motion to begin with?Originally posted by maggot:Hmm...spining really can accelerate the balls to that speed?
The RPM required to spin the balls up to their supposed velocity is still below the RPMs that have been achieved by jet turbines... so yes... it is quite possible. The problem is in controlling the system to spit out the balls and deal with the reactions within the system that makes the whole claim highly suspicious.
Not to mention this inventor makes on claim on how his weapon supposedly does not behave like a gryoscope. -
if im gonna run around wif zombies around me a FN MAG sounds good... AK47 would be good as well if it can have easily reloadable 100rds drum mag out of ammo jus smack the sht out of the zombies
-
Don't need to tell you how many type of those weapons I have firedOriginally posted by SingaporeTyrannosaur:Sigh, when you rely on feelings then at the very least don't trying to come up with any physics for them.
Maybe you are just a poor shooter for the Armbrust... workman blaming the tools? I did not experience "excessive" recoil in my experience with the Armbrust and neither did I miss my target.
And yes, you certainly have no idea about the actual recoil the 84 actually cuts out with it's Recoiless action.
Do the math and your talk is kinda empty.
You are starting to sound like the BMT recruits who make a lot of talk about how the recoil of their 5.56mm M-16 is high and causing them all kinds of problems like shoulder pain and cannot aim. -
Don't need for us to know your Physics was likely a fail.Originally posted by maggot:Don't need to tell you how many type of those weapons I have fired -
The rounds loses it's KE over distances the link you given says it allOriginally posted by SingaporeTyrannosaur:Sigh, not wanting to do your researching and wanting to believe in "recoiless" magnetic repulsion or near those maglev theories that you don't even understand that violate the laws of motion to begin with?
The RPM required to spin the balls up to their supposed velocity is still below the RPMs that have been achieved by jet turbines... so yes... it is quite possible. The problem is in controlling the system to spit out the balls and deal with the reactions within the system that makes the whole claim highly suspicious.
Not to mention this inventor makes on claim on how his weapon supposedly does not behave like a gryoscope.
So the weapon is quite useless at long range
Someone trial run it with a ballistic program -
No I pass my PhysicsOriginally posted by Fingolfin_Noldor:Don't need for us to know your Physics was likely a fail.
-
Then how come even your most basic physics in here all so rosak one?Originally posted by maggot:No I pass my Physics
It's like some guy who pass his driving test to go outside and langar here langar there. Or can't even park on a parking lot the size of a football field.
At the very least refrain from making any scientific statements or speculations until you are actually reasonably sure about doing so. Don't throw in wild speculations and buzzwords like "gauss" and "lorentz" and think it will stick. -
Originally posted by maggot:The rounds loses it's KE over distances the link you given says it all
So the weapon is quite useless at long range
Someone trial run it with a ballistic program
Whatever are you talking about?
All ballistic projectiles lose their KE over distance, what's so magical or unusual about the projectiles of this weapon doing so? The rate of energy loss is dependent on the shape of the projectile (air resistance), muzzle velocity, projectile mass and the like... this applies to ALL ballistic weapons.
So what's so special about it losing KE over distances? What are you trying to imply? That it ought to be a perpetual motion weapons system?
What did you expect? This weapon can launch rounds that will circle the earth (orbital velocity) until it impacts something?
What's the next amazing statement you are going to make?
Really ah, you are quite funny leh. -
Ok here goes
The mechanism is some what like those wheel bearings
Ball bearings are the rounds except there are fins to hold on to the balls to accelerate them
Here's how it shoot off the balls in straight line
Have a shutter on the inner circumference where the balls will spin.
Size must at least be 6 balls width.
The heavy G-force on the balls will send the balls out of the shutter.
Don't build this at home -
I catch no ball with all these physics sh*t...
I also fancy The Punisher's entire armoury though i have to choose one...