Great Picture.Originally posted by Dr Who:
Gen Gordon Bennet........the general who fled the Singapore battlefield without orders, leaving his men to take care of themselves. Typical of defence establishments, he was promoted to Lt Gen.............. but he was never given another field command......
Lt Gen Arthur Percival........the General who retreated all the way and gave the British empire her greatest defeat with the loss of 100,000 POWs in Singapore. He never inspired any confidence with his bugs bunny teeth. He never fought an attacking battle. For his world class exploit, he has a road named after him at Fort Canning... Percival Road .......hahaha...
Adm Tom Philips.........Phillips had long held the A-Star opinion that aircraft were no threat to surface ships, and so he took the battleships HMS Prince of Wales, HMS Repulse, and four destroyers to intercept the Japanese without air cover. He went down with his ships...........Donno whether he has got a road named after him......
=========================================
Just wondering which of the above great men the generals of Singapore would follow in their career path.........
Maybe our generals now in Bali can also hope for field promotions and performance bonus for their great exploits.......like signing the Extradition Treaty as demanded by the mighty Indonesians, supreme power over all the nations........hail.....
the new one yes, the one before the previous one yes, but not the ah bui ....Originally posted by Dr Who:
Lt Gen Percival with his Bugs Bunny teeth. ''
Does our leaders inspire confidence?
And of course, when the war started:
Percival was made a full colonel and from 1936 to 1938 he was General Staff Officer Grade 1 in Malaya, the Chief of Staff to General Dobbie, the General Officer Commanding in Malaya. During this time, he recognised that Singapore was no longer an isolated fortress.[15] He considered the possibility of the Japanese landing in Thailand to "burgle Malaya by the backdoor[16] and conducted an appraisal of the possibility of an attack being launched on Singapore from the North, which was supplied to the War Office, and which Percival subsequently felt was similar to the plan followed by the Japanese in 1941.[17] He also supported Dobbie's unexecuted plan for the construction of fixed defences in Southern Johore. In March 1938, he returned to Britain and was promoted to brigadier on the General Staff, Aldershot Command.
Churchill viewed the fall of Singapore to be "the worst disaster and largest capitulation in British history." However, Britain's defence, the Middle East and the Soviet Union had all received higher priorities in the allocation of men and material, so the desired airforce strength of 300 to 500 aircraft was never reached; whereas the Japanese invaded with over two hundred tanks, the British Army in Malaya did not have a single one.[26]Some of the stuff against him might be unfair, but he did make some mistakes:
In 1918, Percival had been described as "a slim, soft spoken manÂ… with a proven reputation for bravery and organisational powers"[27] but by 1945 this description had been turned on its head with even Percival's defenders describing him as "something of a damp squib".[28] The fall of Singapore switched Percival's reputation to that of an ineffective "staff wallah", lacking ruthlessness and aggression, even though few doubted that he was a brave and determined officer. Over six feet in height and lanky, with a clipped moustache and two protruding teeth, and decidedly unphotogenic, Percival was an easy target for a caricaturist, being described as "tall, bucktoothed and lightly built".[29] There was no doubt his presentation lacked impact as "his manner was low key and he was a poor public speaker with the cusp of a lisp".[30]
Percival was ultimately responsible for the men who served under him, and with other officers – notably Major-General David Murray-Lyon commander of the Indian 11th Infantry Division – he had shown a willingness to replace them when he felt their performance was not up to scratch. Perhaps his greatest mistake was to resist the building of fixed defences in either Johore or the north shore of Singapore, dismissing them in the face of repeated requests to start construction from his Chief Engineer, Brigadier Ivan Simson, with the comment "Defences are bad for morale — for both troops and civilians".[31] In doing so, Percival threw away the potential advantages he could have derived from the 6,000 engineers under his command and perhaps missed his best chance to blunt the danger posed by the Japanese tanks.
Percival also insisted on defending the north-eastern shore of Singapore most heavily, against the advice of the Allied supreme commander in South East Asia, General Archibald Wavell. Percival was perhaps fixed on his responsibilities for defending the Singapore Naval Base.[32] He also spread his forces thinly around the island and kept few units as a strategic reserve. When the Japanese attack came in the west, the Australian 22nd Brigade took the brunt of the assault.[33] Percival refused to reinforce them as he continued to believe that the main assault would occur in the north east.[34]
I understand he is suppose to be some sort of hero from WW1.Originally posted by Fatum:the new one yes, the one before the previous one yes, but not the ah bui ....
he looks more like a towkay than a general ...
It wouldn't have mattered without air or naval cover. The trouble was that they didn't have the equipment to fight with. Quite frankly on the scale of things, we were considered expendable since the war with Germany was far more important. In any case, the British simply didn't have enough naval assets to defend all the way to SEA. It took the last year of the war before they felt secure enough to divert assets from the Mediterranean and Atlantic fleet to India based of Ceylon where they launched attacks against the Japanese and played cat and mouse with them. It was only at Midway and Coral Sea where the Japanese Navy suffered severe setbacks enough for them to actually commit to more serious operations. By the end of the war, the most advanced fleet asset the Duke of York served as flagship.Originally posted by moca:Percival was actually quite competent and had won medals for valour in battle etc... He was certainly no coward nor was he a desk jockey and political lapdog like our SAF "Generals".
Percival knew years before that the Japs would be coming from Kota Tinggi and Thailand. (However, why he didn't situate naval guns at Kota Tinggi or other such preparations I don't know.)
But he had many other things stacked against him also. He was unable to get the aircrafts, tanks and more seasoned troops that he had been requesting for.
The fact that he lost the battle caused all his mistakes to be highlighted after the war. The Japs also made many errors during their invasion but no one rbing them up cos they won.
The retreat was set off when, without permissin, ground crew vacated an entire airfield intact after coming under attack from Japs planes. This set off a panic among Indian troops who saw to their surprise the white sahibs fleeing even before a single Jap soldier appeared.
The aircraft carrrier that was supposed to arrive with the Repulse and Prince of Wales had run aground and didn't make the trip.
The Japanese tanks are also quite useless but they provided fire support for their troops. If they were facing Soviet armour, they would be screwed. Zhukov mauled them when they tried to invade Siberia, so much so that the Japanese quietly negotiated a peace treaty and avoided attacking the Soviet Union during WWII. When the war came to a close, the Soviets invaded Manchuria and routed the Japanese pretty thoroughly. Given time, they would have invaded Hokaido too.Originally posted by Texcoco II:Actually I have read in Peter Elphick's Singapore: The Pregnable Fortress that the British actually DID have some light tanks, which send and arrived halfway in the malayan war onboard "Empress of Asia" ship (correct me this if im wrong) but these are so obsolete and un-maintainable that they are used as static gun platforms , the fate of these tanks and the type is not stated in the book, my personal opinion of those tanks are probably of the type, British Vickers 6-Ton
The fact always overlooked was that Britain was NOT AT WAR with Japan prior to the attack on Singapore.Originally posted by Fingolfin_Noldor:...Quite frankly on the scale of things, we were considered expendable since the war with Germany was far more important. In any case, the British simply didn't have enough naval assets to defend all the way to SEA.