Er... SEALs=US, SBS=British... It's the british who got held, not the AmericansOriginally posted by Shotgun:They'd find their persian kitty asses swarmed by SEALs. Nobody screws with Americans and don't get screwed in return.
chanjyj, don't think you're very funny or smart. I was answering Pitot's question.Originally posted by chanjyj:Er... SEALs=US, SBS=British... It's the british who got held, not the Americans
What for, let's send you there instead.Originally posted by ditzy:They get 10 trident ICBMs heading their way.
I would.Originally posted by Pitot:How many of u would wager a bet that if it was US marines doing the raid they wouldnt have been captured?
I am not questioning the sense of whether the british would retaliate but whether the Iranians picked on the british.Originally posted by Shotgun:I would.
There'd be Iranian boats damaged if not sunk, and 15 marines KIA.
KIA? I dont think soOriginally posted by Shotgun:I would.
There'd be Iranian boats damaged if not sunk, and 15 marines KIA.
Oh I think so.Originally posted by LazerLordz:KIA? I dont think so
I'd be thinking some warning shots from mother hen at least.
U didn't say blue on blue.Originally posted by Shotgun:Oh I think so.
Given the track record of Marines experience in coordinating air support in 2003, we'd have a few damaged Iranian boats and 15 Marines killed by friendly fire from the "Warning shots."
Sorry My bad nvr read properlyOriginally posted by Shotgun:chanjyj, don't think you're very funny or smart. I was answering Pitot's question.
No worries.Originally posted by chanjyj:Sorry My bad nvr read properly