An interesting article about network centric warfare
-
Ok, its not a white paper or anything. Just a quick primer about the difficulties of getting all the network stuff working together AND having it available to the guys in the front. From a US point of view.
Link! -
USA Sucks! Down with American Imperialism!
-
Murphy's law: Its human to err, but you need a computer to really phuck things up.
-
I think the next "new" unit in the SAF will be the
"2nd Signal Bn (Network Assualt)"
This unit's role is to interdict (jam) opposing armed forces network.... -
Most probably, we already have them.Originally posted by spencer99:I think the next "new" unit in the SAF will be the
"2nd Signal Bn (Network Assualt)"
This unit's role is to interdict (jam) opposing armed forces network....
-
Great when and if it works. Probably needs another 5 to 10 years before systems like these can work reliably & effectively for the infantryman.
With HQs, vehicle/armor/arty mounted systems, maybe can wotk & in the near future ( 3 to 5 years ). -
I always wonder...if infantry man dies/gets captured...wont the enemy now have access to all the information? That will really screw things up
-
At the critical moment, where enemy is approaching, you ask for backup using the high tech device...
the system connecting...
and connecting...
it lags...
it eventually hangs...
god bless you... -
This program has performed and illegal operation....Originally posted by Hocklez:At the critical moment, where enemy is approaching, you ask for backup using the high tech device...
the system connecting...
and connecting...
it lags...
it eventually hangs...
god bless you...