Yes, it is chambered for the 223/5.56 cartridge.Originally posted by SpecOps87:Does it uses the 5.56 as well? Seems that the butt is gonna be a little problem to shoulder.Doesn't look all that comfortable. Hope you have fun with it though.
Originally posted by Meia Gisborn:for once i wondered why was the barrel pointing backwards then i realised that was the silly butt springs(i prefer to call it this)
I took the AR pistol to the range this morning for its initial firing and break-in. Good news! It did not blow up, so I guess I did put it together correctly.
It was a bit of a non-event, as the pistol functioned perfectly. As expected from the short barrel, the muzzle report was quite loud, though recoil was extremely controllable. I had handloaded a batch of reduced power cartridges specifically for this pistol to help control the recoil, but found that they were unecessary as the pistol handled my regular handloads comfortably. Accuracy at 50 yards was surprisingly good, given that I was using a plain old unmagnified red-dot sight; I was averaging sub-3-inch groups with my handloads.
The biggest problem was finding a way to comfortably hold the pistol off-hand. It's waaay too front-heavy to be gripped like a regular handgun, so the support hand has to hold the handguards. This ends up being much like how you would hold a rifle, except that now you don't have the benefit of a buttstock to jam against your shoulder. The whole contraption basically just 'floats' in front of your right cheek as you aim and fire it.
I still do not see a practical purpose for a pistol derivative of an AR rifle. You don't get rifle velocities from the short barrel, and it's too large to be handled as a pistol. So, yes, it [b]is a toy for now. [/b]
Originally posted by Meia Gisborn:Well, I was thinking the same thing when I first saw your new "toy". That you can calling it a "pistol" will soon change when you find you have to hold it like a rifle.
The biggest problem was finding a way to comfortably hold the pistol off-hand. It's waaay too front-heavy to be gripped like a regular handgun, so the support hand has to hold the handguards. This ends up being much like how you would hold a rifle, except that now you don't have the benefit of a buttstock to jam against your shoulder. The whole contraption basically just 'floats' in front of your right cheek as you aim and fire it.
I still do not see a practical purpose for a pistol derivative of an AR rifle. You don't get rifle velocities from the short barrel, and it's too large to be handled as a pistol. So, yes, it [b]is a toy for now. [/b]
Unfortunately, putting a buttstock on a firearm with a barrel of less than 16" qualifies it as a short-barreled rifle under BATFE regulations, the possession of which is illegal unless it is registered with the BATFE and the appropriate fees ($200) paid.Originally posted by moca:I would definitely recommend you add on a extendable buttstock like that on the M-4 so it is "goodbye pistol, hello carbine".
What a strange country... AmericaOriginally posted by Meia Gisborn:Unfortunately, putting a buttstock on a firearm with a barrel of less than 16" qualifies it as a short-barreled rifle under BATFE regulations, the possession of which is illegal unless it is registered with the BATFE and the appropriate fees ($200) paid.
That's a route I'd rather not take.
Actually, with the exception of the somewhat longer (for a pistol, that is) barrel, I wanted to keep it as compact and light as possible. A good forward grip would require some sort of free-floating handguard for a solid mount, and that would just add weight.Originally posted by davechng:nice setup Meia ...Maybe a good forward grip and a nice short sling would help shoot the rilfe! 10.5" is a good choice ! STay away from anything shorter than that!
I did not have as much good expereince with short barreled M16. Mine always tear up the bolt after a 1 to 2 thousand rounds! the bolt just crack!....
GO the SBR on the rifle ! it would be better if it comes with a collapsable stock
DaveC