MLRS .... A big thread to Singapore?
-
defend itself in war???.........even with the best weaponry......with the SILLIEST and the most MORONIC commander in control won't make it a success.............Originally posted by Singapore_Shit:Does anyone think Singapore can defend itself in a war? Don't be deluded by what our military has in store. Its all a load of bollocks.
Fancy you boys wasting time out there serving NS for nothing.
a war runned on just military weapon superioirity is just crap...........tactics of a war........contribute a major part as well.......
in times of war.............you will remember this statement real well.......TO HELL WITH YOU!!!!!
-
We serve NS so that if we meet scum like you in a dark alley, we can pound you senseless.Originally posted by gd4u:Did the "Troll Radar" sense smt??
If u happen to take a close look at military nuts and SAF threads... There are some indication of classified stuff which seems, vital, if anything were to happen. Anyway, the world did not view RSAF as a superior force for nth. -
Well, for a 50 MLRS salvo sneak attack to succeed on Singapore, it would probably mean we lost the intelligence war. If that happens, we are screwed anyways.
But if that didn't happen, and we know they are coming with us with MLRS, I think chances are most of the MLRS will be taken down, minus a few that actually get to launch.
Reason for not killing them all: It gives us a damn good case on the UN to have some press coverage of MAF MLRS rockets barraging suntec city, with all the women and children shopping innoncently there. Of course, its also an excuse to open a huge can of whoop ass.
MLRS: I'm not impressed by it. Its not an artillery asset that is easily available. Nor can it sustain fire. An MLRS maybe able to get off a large wave of initial fire, but we can shoot all day long with howitzers, provided we don't run out of shells. At more than 4 rounds per minute, with ICMs, and the amount of Howitzer we have, its a steel rain. -
Btw MRLS range is only 36KM, our FH-2000 is 40KM so if e MRLS can hit us we can hit them unless u use e ER rocket which US is not exporting. N MRLS cant sustain fire but arty can. For MRLS larger volume of fire this can be overcome by arty using FAE
-
That is incorrect. The Astro II can fire about 4 different rockets. The biggest one has a range of about 80km.Originally posted by spartan6:Btw MRLS range is only 36KM, our FH-2000 is 40KM so if e MRLS can hit us we can hit them unless u use e ER rocket which US is not exporting. N MRLS cant sustain fire but arty can. For MRLS larger volume of fire this can be overcome by arty using FAE -
Sorry Sorry astro III dun = MRLS ,i get wat u saying liao i thought u talking about TAT MRLS,anyway it 90KM not 80 for astro III
-
Eh, wat i do ???Originally posted by moca:We serve NS so that if we meet scum like you in a dark alley, we can pound you senseless. -
A lot of people will care!Originally posted by Pitot:Seriously, its just the rule book. But even if someone does this.. who will care? In a war. They can say its a mistake, or simply accuse that place to house military equipment. Just wondering, singapore got nothing.. who will come to our aid if we have a war?
Btw, If our neighbours do have MLRS, I'm sure they will be high up on RSAF's target list.
Because if some rockets really explode in Suntec they will be killing as equal numbers of Sporeans and Malayisa's origin permament residents and foreign talents working there...
A lot of people is gonna get very pissed... and I'm not referring to Singaporeans alone... -
in my opinion.. the only viable singapore target for their MRLS is pulau tekong.Originally posted by Paladin:A lot of people will care!
Because if some rockets really explode in Suntec they will be killing as equal numbers of Sporeans and Malayisa's origin permament residents and foreign talents working there...
A lot of people is gonna get very pissed... and I'm not referring to Singaporeans alone...
can kill lots of NS boys... -
Sorry, sorry, quoted wrong post. pai sehOriginally posted by gd4u:Eh, wat i do ???
-
using their priced weapon to kill recruits?i would think our airbases are more viable targets. they are open spaces with NO civilians, so they can worry less about colateral damageOriginally posted by tripwire:in my opinion.. the only viable singapore target for their MRLS is pulau tekong.
can kill lots of NS boys... -
You don't know the meaning of "bollocks", trust me. How could you when you have none yourself? Having spent all your life under some rock and never having stood up for anything, least of all your country.Originally posted by Singapore_Shit:Does anyone think Singapore can defend itself in a war? Don't be deluded by what our military has in store. Its all a load of bollocks.
Fancy you boys wasting time out there serving NS for nothing.
We serve NS cos we believe in our country. We can proudly hold our head up high. -
Definitely airbases. This is their weapon to counter our airforce Either their MLRS strike first at our airbases, or if we strike them with our airforce first, the surviving MLRS will fire at our airbases when RSAF planes are on the way home.Originally posted by beavan:using their priced weapon to kill recruits?i would think our airbases are more viable targets. they are open spaces with NO civilians, so they can worry less about colateral damage -
I agree with some of you...
I think in an likely event... MLRS can easily knock out our air bases into a temporary unless... But our fighter planes don't just reside in Singapore alone... But all around our northern neighbour...
2ndly The likelyhood that can do that is by destroying our runway.. coz our planes mostly hide underground...
A little misunderstanding by most people is that MLRS can easily start shooting within a min and left the location within a min before a single F2000 can be setup... Unless Singapore have a 24 hour battery always ready and looking for arty else its amost impossible for you to know when it's coming and where it left... The MLRS would probably be then at soemwhere else resupplying..
Incase that most doesn't know... MLRS had a very wide area of destruction... Probably at least 500m compared to Howitzer 50m if I'm not wrong. Likely while the SAF boys crossing the Causeway... and the "XXXXX" to the north... they will recieved constant bombardment... by the MLRS..
Then again.... I doubt SAF would crumbled singlely by the MLRS of Malaysia perhaps temporary.... the weaponary of SAF is sufficent to retaliate a big blow back to our neighbour without the effort of a wink.... -
Kpkb la....Who would want to attack Singapore...Singapore got wat lan pa profitable to attack ? Si mi lanqiao poon bo....Go and sleep la all of u
-
The SAF is not built up in the 21st cent to fight our neighbour..Originally posted by banzie:I agree with some of you...
I think in an likely event... MLRS can easily knock out our air bases into a temporary unless... But our fighter planes don't just reside in Singapore alone... But all around our northern neighbour...
2ndly The likelyhood that can do that is by destroying our runway.. coz our planes mostly hide underground...
A little misunderstanding by most people is that MLRS can easily start shooting within a min and left the location within a min before a single F2000 can be setup... Unless Singapore have a 24 hour battery always ready and looking for arty else its amost impossible for you to know when it's coming and where it left... The MLRS would probably be then at soemwhere else resupplying..
Incase that most doesn't know... MLRS had a very wide area of destruction... Probably at least 500m compared to Howitzer 50m if I'm not wrong. Likely while the SAF boys crossing the Causeway... and the "XXXXX" to the north... they will recieved constant bombardment... by the MLRS..
Then again.... I doubt SAF would crumbled singlely by the MLRS of Malaysia perhaps temporary.... the weaponary of SAF is sufficent to retaliate a big blow back to our neighbour without the effort of a wink.... -
Not defend from our neighbour tat who ? tok co-ck~~Originally posted by LazerLordz:The SAF is not built up in the 21st cent to fight our neighbour..
-
your 500m radius of destruction is actually the dispersal zone size of the astro rocket submunition..Originally posted by banzie:I agree with some of you...
I think in an likely event... MLRS can easily knock out our air bases into a temporary unless... But our fighter planes don't just reside in Singapore alone... But all around our northern neighbour...
2ndly The likelyhood that can do that is by destroying our runway.. coz our planes mostly hide underground...
A little misunderstanding by most people is that MLRS can easily start shooting within a min and left the location within a min before a single F2000 can be setup... Unless Singapore have a 24 hour battery always ready and looking for arty else its amost impossible for you to know when it's coming and where it left... The MLRS would probably be then at soemwhere else resupplying..
Incase that most doesn't know... MLRS had a very wide area of destruction... Probably at least 500m compared to Howitzer 50m if I'm not wrong. Likely while the SAF boys crossing the Causeway... and the "XXXXX" to the north... they will recieved constant bombardment... by the MLRS..
Then again.... I doubt SAF would crumbled singlely by the MLRS of Malaysia perhaps temporary.... the weaponary of SAF is sufficent to retaliate a big blow back to our neighbour without the effort of a wink....
and about the astro shoot and scoot... it doesnt really matter... as the chinese saying goes.. the monk can run.. but the temple cannot..
if RSAF F-16 is the monk... the AFBs are the temple.
if the astro launcher is the monk.... i leave it to u to think... what is the temple. -
Speaking about range...what is the distance between Singapore and the major cities in Peninsula Malaysia? For example KL?
-
Actually, about 300km as the crow flies.Originally posted by tankee1981:Speaking about range...what is the distance between Singapore and the major cities in Peninsula Malaysia? For example KL?
So there is no other way for us to hit KL except by air or buy a cruise missile.
On the other hand, if they concentrate their forces in Johore they can shell Singapore city at will. So forward defense is not just being gung ho, it is necessary for our survival. In fact, we must be so aggressive that at the first sign of them being funny we must take action. -
I agree taking of Johore is vital 2 our survial in any conflict with Malaysia
-
i see no need to hit KL...Originally posted by tankee1981:Speaking about range...what is the distance between Singapore and the major cities in Peninsula Malaysia? For example KL?
neutralising the enemy force on the other side of FEBA with all we got... would be the key to victory.. not by bombing civilian targets... it makes us look bad. -
Any of our neighbours operate MLRS? If not, useless conjuncture at this point. What hurts us also hurts them.
-
The Malaysian army already deployed the Astros II MLRS which is made in Brazil.
NST article:
http://www.singapore-window.org/sw00/001127ns.htm
Specs of ASTROS:
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/astros.htm -
he he.. oh yeah...Originally posted by Advante_101:Kpkb la....Who would want to attack Singapore...Singapore got wat lan pa profitable to attack ? Si mi lanqiao poon bo....Go and sleep la all of u
u guys ask MLRS big threat ma.. so i ask what if got 50 MLRS bomb ur ass say i wanna find fight.. like that so sensitive. 78...