China buy Sg LST
-
China is buying license to built Sg LST.
-
Any link to confirm what u have said?
-
Wow, wat a strange news. Ani source to verify. I wonder if true, wat will Taiwan and USA reactions be like. Aren't they afraid China might chiong the LST design and become their own cheapo LST. BTW, isit the Endurance class? I thought recently China have create various new classes of LSD,LST?
-
Hope that's as far as it goes. I don't like how this recent agreement is going.
Might throw our delicate strategic balance off a bit.. -
I think China has their own program.... plus they can get advise from more experience builder like Russia,no need from young country like spore -
maybe ours is really good?
-
That looks cool ... PLAN ship ??Originally posted by zenden9:
I think China has their own program.... plus they can get advise from more experience builder like Russia,no need from young country like spore
But if USMC is using our Ultimax SAW as replacement, y China can't take our LST ?? -
maybe they want to learn something/gained experience from our Endurance design so that they can be later implemented into their new generation LSD. where's the source from anyway?
-
China has plenty of LSTs.. and they usually only copy military stuff they can't acquire.. thanks to the US lead saunction. Copying design stuff is one thing .. what's inside is another.
BTW, only the balast system of endurance class is what they are interested in. If they could licence built them they wouldn't copy. Not that they would not copy the balast system, but which country don't... Singapore too learnt it this way.. thru licencing. -
UTAS you might wanna back up your claim with soild fact / link from reputable source,
-
Hi UTAS,Originally posted by UTAS:China is buying license to built Sg LST.
This is not personal, but I feel that if you want to make any claim, it is better that you are able to provide a source or link to back your claim.
If not, people may take your claim as such (as if you have a claim which you will provide later) and start contributing to a wide-goose issue that doesn't exist!
Moderators - I suggest that for future unclaim topics, it is better to remove such threads.Originally posted by Orcishwarrior:UTAS you might wanna back up your claim with soild fact / link from reputable source.
IMO