Oakley (Military)
-
Hi,
A newbie here in this forum. Heard Sheares are marketing the Oakley (military) for military personnel (Regular only).
Not sure whether are they the sole distributor for the military Oakley, but my unit are taking order, based on 1 pair per order. -
CAn i have 1 pair too? Nsf tho.. :/
-
Oakley what?
Oakley makes many products you know... -
Hi, nice to meet you.Originally posted by black_ops7:Hi,
A newbie here in this forum. Heard Sheares are marketing the Oakley (military) for military personnel (Regular only).
Not sure whether are they the sole distributor for the military Oakley, but my unit are taking order, based on 1 pair per order.
By the way, I find it very interesting that your first post is about what is essentially a "commercial opportunity". IE Are you sure you're not like from Sheares Marketing?
Just a thought. -
what is the product? goggles? at what price?
btw, which unit are u in? -
Hi lwflee,
I'm sorry that by making my first post here on that topic makes you think that i'm someone from Sheares and are trying to take that as a "commercial opportunity" for Sheares, then i shouldn't have post it in the first place.
My intent was to ask whether any members here did come across of Oakley military sunnies being market here in Spore, as i know they're hard to come by.
Hi Moonstriker and triggersgd,
Sorry, to prevent any misunderstanding here, i don't think it's appropriate for me to answer your questions.
Thank you and Kind Regards. -
Hmm....heard that vocational DRIVERS will be getting sunglassess. Dunno how true is that. But heard from my tpt sups and drivers friends. But then again, think oakley too ex....
-
Hi mhcampboy,
Sorry, i'm not so sure about drivers getting sunnies, but i personally think they should have one while on the road, especially driving the LSV.
I don't think those military Oakley sunnies are too ex as compare to those commercially available. -
Eh...Don't apologize lehOriginally posted by black_ops7:Hi lwflee,
I'm sorry that by making my first post here on that topic makes you think that i'm someone from Sheares and are trying to take that as a "commercial opportunity" for Sheares, then i shouldn't have post it in the first place.
My intent was to ask whether any members here did come across of Oakley military sunnies being market here in Spore, as i know they're hard to come by.
So I take it you are talking about Oakley Sunglasses? -
r u in special unit or what? if u can't even say this which is not classified then why do u post in the first place? look not asking full details...just like 1 SIR etc...even if u r SOF u can say special forces n period.Originally posted by black_ops7:Hi Moonstriker and triggersgd,
Sorry, to prevent any misunderstanding here, i don't think it's appropriate for me to answer your questions.
Thank you and Kind Regards.
as for product, don't keep people guessing. if u can type so much in your first post then surely this oakley thing is not something that is classified.
for ur information, unless u r wearing a new NVG which mindef have not released in their official articles, then i don't see why u need to be so secretive.
u might as well dun post in the 1st place? bcos not much info is given. as readers, i think there's a fair amt of frustration of not knowing what u r referring to. -
Sheares have been selling those oakleys for quite a while already. Saw it on their shelves for a long time alr.
Strange thing, why would SAF go through sheares if its an official purchase. They would usually got straight to the supplier don't u think?
Personally, i wouldnt go for the Oakleys. 2 reason. Most of their M-Frames don't look too good on asian faces. (LOOKS WISE)
2nd reason, they are not combat proven. First of all, some might want, "wat heck, sunglasses? wad combat proven?" If u want to wear a pair of sunglasses, it shud do 2 things, protect ur eyes from UV rays, and prevent ur eyes from taking physical damage. For that, i haven't read of any "acclaims" for oakley's products, so someone correct me if im wrong.
Instead, recently, I went for the ESS ICE 2.4 system instead. FIrst of all, its a hell lot cheaper. 2nd, its GOOD, real polycarbonate lenses. US Army units have already been issued ESS products in Iraq, and many of them have written back to commend ESS on their products that save their vision when IEDs blew up in their faces, chamber explosions etc. Because the US Army has already included it as standard issue, all their products already have NSN numbers. IF SAF was to make such a purchase, i would think they would go for ESS instead, since it would be easily integrated into the current logistic system.
black_ops7, u still wanna go for oakleys? -
Actually, Oakley lenses are supposed to exceed the standards required for safety glasses. ANSI z87.1 or something ??? I do not think there are any problems with their lenses. The problem with them will be cost.Originally posted by Shotgun:Sheares have been selling those oakleys for quite a while already. Saw it on their shelves for a long time alr.
Strange thing, why would SAF go through sheares if its an official purchase. They would usually got straight to the supplier don't u think?
Personally, i wouldnt go for the Oakleys. 2 reason. Most of their M-Frames don't look too good on asian faces. (LOOKS WISE)
2nd reason, they are not combat proven. First of all, some might want, "wat heck, sunglasses? wad combat proven?" If u want to wear a pair of sunglasses, it shud do 2 things, protect ur eyes from UV rays, and prevent ur eyes from taking physical damage. For that, i haven't read of any "acclaims" for oakley's products, so someone correct me if im wrong.
Instead, recently, I went for the ESS ICE 2.4 system instead. FIrst of all, its a hell lot cheaper. 2nd, its GOOD, real polycarbonate lenses. US Army units have already been issued ESS products in Iraq, and many of them have written back to commend ESS on their products that save their vision when IEDs blew up in their faces, chamber explosions etc. Because the US Army has already included it as standard issue, all their products already have NSN numbers. IF SAF was to make such a purchase, i would think they would go for ESS instead, since it would be easily integrated into the current logistic system.
black_ops7, u still wanna go for oakleys? -
yes, ESS goggles have been used by the US troops in iraq and yes there are better than the ones of oakley and yes, they are also much cheaperOriginally posted by Shotgun:Sheares have been selling those oakleys for quite a while already. Saw it on their shelves for a long time alr.
Strange thing, why would SAF go through sheares if its an official purchase. They would usually got straight to the supplier don't u think?
Personally, i wouldnt go for the Oakleys. 2 reason. Most of their M-Frames don't look too good on asian faces. (LOOKS WISE)
2nd reason, they are not combat proven. First of all, some might want, "wat heck, sunglasses? wad combat proven?" If u want to wear a pair of sunglasses, it shud do 2 things, protect ur eyes from UV rays, and prevent ur eyes from taking physical damage. For that, i haven't read of any "acclaims" for oakley's products, so someone correct me if im wrong.
Instead, recently, I went for the ESS ICE 2.4 system instead. FIrst of all, its a hell lot cheaper. 2nd, its GOOD, real polycarbonate lenses. US Army units have already been issued ESS products in Iraq, and many of them have written back to commend ESS on their products that save their vision when IEDs blew up in their faces, chamber explosions etc. Because the US Army has already included it as standard issue, all their products already have NSN numbers. IF SAF was to make such a purchase, i would think they would go for ESS instead, since it would be easily integrated into the current logistic system.
black_ops7, u still wanna go for oakleys? -
Hi triggersgd,
Sry if you feel offended, but i personally think that i'd hv my bit of not reviewing my current unit. I hope members here can grant me that fair bit of privacy.
I dont mean that there're classifications to the sunnies, thus i didnt elaborate much about the products. Hope we don't mix the lack of product details with any classification in relation to my job. Honestly, if i would know that my initial post would strike such a spark, i wouldnt have post it.
Hi Shotgun,
I totally agreed with lwflee's point. For the $$$ factor, do you think $132 for an Oakley M-frame reasonable?
And if i'm not wrong, SAF dont go through Sheares to buy the Oakley sunnies. Personnel buy the sunnies through their own pocket money.
Hi chunyong,
Totally agreed with you, but let's not forget that there're other brand being worn by current soldiers. Brand like Scotts, Wiley X, etc.
Hi lwflee
Thanks bro, i'm not trying to be apologetic.
To all, i'm sorry if my intial post has caused up such a stir here. Hope we can put all debates and personal opinions/preferences aside and move on.
Cheers! -
Oakley sunglasses lah...Originally posted by lwflee:Oakley what?
Oakley makes many products you know... -
Oops...
Yup, Oakley made sunglassess, goggles, boots, bags, etc.
Rgds. -
black ops, no worries...
sorry for sounding angry...but am abit when i read ur post... 
since u have posted, pls carry on with ur postings...enjoy urself in sgforums. cya around. -
Even when I own a couple of Oakley sun shade, when I'm on the road I'm still rather rely on my cheap cheap Skyline polarize sun shade. To me, Oakley is juz an expensive look kool sunshade but when come to effectiveness... a $300 Oakley cannot even compare to a $50 Skyline.
Juz my 2 cents worth. -
Oakley M-Frames for $132 is dirt cheap. I don't believe anyone would sell at this price unless OAKLEY themselves are supplying, OR its fake.
Is Oakley M-frames already marketed in Singapore? YES. I remember making inquiries a year back or more. Lots interest in it cos of its hefty price tag.
So far, the only SAF peeps I've only seen wearing it were from CDO and SOF. It probably has something to do with looking garang. But I don't recall it being a "standard issue" by SAF yet... nor is it part of some buy Oakley M's for poor regular funds. Haven't heard of such a scheme. I believe the regulars themselves earn enough to buy it own their own.
2ndly, i still don't see why u need to mention ur unit when u are just asking about who is marketing Oakley M Frames in Singapore.
I believe Oakley themselves supply to third party distributors to sell. There hasn't been any major marketing or A&P specially for the M'Frames. Reason being its not a very nice looking design.
Honestly speaking, I don't really go around asking ppl wat unit they are from the forums. 1, cos it could be confidential. 2, they could be bullsh!tting. Then again, if someone is bullsh!tting here to be SOF, i think he'd get found out sooner or later lar.
If u're from Infantry, Guards, armor etc... just say formation. No need to be so hush hush. If CDO or SOF< just say special forces. If u are from JID, den u will probably know wat to answer when asked in the first place instead of implying that u are from a confidential unit.
Cheers yeah? Btw, i still reccomend going for ESS. -
Oakley M-frame has been in the marketing for quite a while, but not the military version, if you understand what i mean. Both version are the same, in general, except the colour of the "O' on the arms of the glasses are different, and of course, the differences in price too.
Much agreed, $132 for a pair of M-frame is dirt cheap. Nope, SAF isn't buying it as a standard issue for all reg and there isnt such a scheme available.
Well, maybe i should change my nick to "recruit" instead . IMHO, the issue here isnt really about the Oakley (military) or whatever not, probably it's all about the nick i used.
Anyway, Shotgun, tks for your understanding. Liked i've said earlier, if members feels that it's a "hush hush" attitude, then i sincerely apologise for that.
At the end of the day, what is utmost important is that the individual must be happy or contented with what he buys or owns. Eg, i'm very happy with my Nokia 8210. Do i need to spend the extra dollars for a better phone?
Btw, how can i change my nick? -
where to get the ESS shades?
-
i've seen them at some of the optical shops, but i cant really recall the actual shop. Can try Capitol optic.Originally posted by storm_freaky13:where to get the ESS shades? -
first thing first, i am not from the coy....
i was at AA06, the main supplier( i think) had a kisok there...
i took the name card from them...
the site is www.military.sg
it has some details where to get the ESS stuff
i was interested in their ESS googles....but...
i wear specs and i tried them on.....
while it says its suitable for us ppl wearing specs...
i can only say its a very tight fit....and pushes the specs very close to the face....not very comfortable....but the strap has a unqiue buckle system...
diff from the Oakley googles...supposed to be better with a better fit with a helmet ...
btw, i used to drive m113s ..still do..cept in reservist now...haha -
thanks for the info will check them out one day. damn. should have found this out earlier and not blown away 300 bucks on a pair of oakleys.
-
ESS shades goggles can be purchased from koolook at suntec. Usual price for ICE is abt $150. I had 20% discount for AA2006.
while ESS may not have the nice branding as oakleys, or the outrageous lense shape of the M-frames, it still affords the same degree of protection to ur eyes.
Plus, u can have prescription lenses that can be inserted under the shades itself. IF u are not contact lense user already.