Because the technology on our Hawkeyes are getting old. The US versions were upgraded and may be upgraded again.Originally posted by coolant:Why replacement? As long as US is still using.![]()
On the carriers, they are still using the E-2C.Originally posted by sgf:Correct me if I'm wrong but I tot US is using E-3 Sentry no longer E-2C?
Correct me if i am wrongOriginally posted by sgf:Correct me if I'm wrong but I tot US is using E-3 Sentry no longer E-2C?
Yes.UKis using the E-3. We were rumoured to be interested in the E-3 a while back.Originally posted by Ponders:Correct me if i am wrong
E3 is Air Force
E2-C is Navy and carrier base?
i never know till recently AWACS planes are sensitive that US only sold to ppl they trust.
That might explain why 2 of our nearest neighbours don't have AWACS, though one is rumoured to be looking at one. I guess Soviet origin.Originally posted by Ponders:Correct me if i am wrong
E3 is Air Force
E2-C is Navy and carrier base?
i never know till recently AWACS planes are sensitive that US only sold to ppl they trust.
Soviet origin! Just like their MIG-29s, i guess.Originally posted by sgf:That might explain why 2 of our nearest neighbours don't have AWACS, though one is rumoured to be looking at one. I guess Soviet origin.
I don't think they intend to squeeze all in this year. Don't forget how long it took them to decide on F-15SG. It will probably take as long if not longer to decide on replacement for F-5 and E-2C.Originally posted by duotiga83:our top neighbour is interested in the Saab Erieye....do we have enough budget to have so many replacement in such a short time?
we purchase F-15SG, ec-130 for heli trainer now trainer a/c replacement, then later AJT and F-5
do we have to squeeze all within this yr?
should be. since they use US avionicsOriginally posted by Shotgun:A-50s! LoL! I wonder how is the A-50 gonna shared data with their other western bloc aircraft. I heard our aircraft are all capable of sharing data with US forces?
--DSTA harnesses cutting edge technology to develop unmanned ground vehicle ,"We will have to look at replacing the E-2C, which has been with us for 14 years. I think the time has come," says Maj Gen Lim Chuan Poh, Singapore's Chief of Defence Force (CDF). "There are a few options to look at. There could be completely new ways of meeting the requirement. It could evolve into two different sets of platforms to meet expanded operational capabilities."
One option is a system like the LALEE, studied for three years by a team under Lui. This unmanned air vehicle is described by Prof Lui Pao Chuen, chief defence scientist at MINDEF as "an integrated airborne surveillance and communications system to provide continuous temporal and very large spatial coverage". This would "provide a task group operating in the littorals with continuous surveillance from the air [at a cost] considerably cheaper than operating current-generation surveillance and communications platforms". [/quote]---In-depth feature on Singapore's defence in JDW ,
Jane's Defence Weekly Vol 35 Issue 26 - 27 - Friday, 22 June, 2001
2. Low altitude long-enduring endurance---LALEEmay be the replacement.Defence engineers have also been working on the Lalee, or low altitude long-enduring endurance, a large aircraft that can fly unmanned or be piloted manually.It is designed to fly at around 18,000m, above the airways and below satellite surveillance systems, possibly serving as an integrated airborne surveillance and communications system, to provide continuous coverage over a large area.
Originally posted by LazerLordz:UK using E3? Since when? You mean the NATO aircraft? Believe UK is buying something else.
[b]
Yes.UKis using the E-3. We were rumoured to be interested in the E-3 a while back. b]
Erhhh... I don't think defense budget is big enough to upgrade the E2C to Hawkeye 2000 standard and still buy the gilfstream with Phalco systems.Originally posted by SpecOps87:But comparing the E2 with the Gulfstream, will there be any issues of integrating the Gulfstreams into the RSAF.Also, isn't it better to further upgradeour E2C and have the gulfstreams as backups?Whats the difference in Radar coverage?
One of the main reasons why more people don't buy AWACs sooner is the cost. These planes don't come cheap.Originally posted by sgf:That might explain why 2 of our nearest neighbours don't have AWACS, though one is rumoured to be looking at one. I guess Soviet origin.
Dr Tan Jiak Kwang, ST Aero's chief engineer, said the MAV-1, which looks like the F-117 Nighthawk Stealth Fighter, is built entirely out of composites.
The 'batwing' is powered by a single turbofan engine producing 100lbs of thrust.
Over the next six months, a series of tests will be conducted on the flight systems.
Right now, the demonstrator, as they call it, can carry a load of 20kg of equipment like cameras and sensors. It has a wingspan of 1.8m.
If the tests prove successful, a scaled-up version can be built. It will have a wingspan of 8m and should be able to carry 800kg. The range is expected to be comparable to that of a jet fighter.
I believe the UK uses the NimrodOriginally posted by insouciant:UK using E3? Since when? You mean the NATO aircraft? Believe UK is buying something else.