Good qsns you raised there...was thinking exactly the same thoughts as you...Originally posted by kurios55:I think the question about how they are supposed to be used in conjunction with a RDF would be predicated on a few factors,
1. How much ammo do they carry with them in battle?
2. How long does it take from the time it is "dropped" from the helo to the 1st round out?
3. How long does it take to redeploy either via their own SP or via helo again?
I personally dun think that they will be used in a sustained fashion but more of a punch when firepower is really needed.
U should have known how the design process was sia...Originally posted by Orcishwarrior:What an upleasant looking design. Seeing it around in khatib camp makes me wonder. Cant DSTA put it the extra effort / Time designing a nice chassis for this pounder.It does kinda help in any possible export.
Originally posted by Moonstriker:Its also called Project Rubik when it haven't been commisioned.
Trained on maintainence of this gun already for past 9 months...
3.Spec:
The Pegasus is the world's first heli-portable 155mm howitzer with a self-propelled capability
Ammunition Loading System (ALS)
Powered by the APU, the ALS automatically loads ammunition to reduce crew fatigue. This allows the gun crew to operate the Pegasus for a longer period while maintaining a burst rate of 3 rounds in 24 seconds.
Ease of Deployment
As a complex system that needs to be readily deployed for mobility, firing and heli-lifting, the Pegasus is easy to configure without any lifting support in the field. Through a simple seesaw action that shifts the gun's centre of gravity to suit the different missions, the Pegasus can be rapidly engaged for deployment in less than 2.5 minutes with a detachment of 8 men.
Lightweight Materials
The Pegasus employs lightweight materials like titanium and high alloy aluminium that provides the strength and stability required to withstand the recoil force of a 155mm system.
Innovative Recoil Management
The recoil of the Pegasus is a third lower than conventional 155mm howitzers. This is achieved through innovative recoil management design.
2.
What is wrong with the design?Sg military products generally looks nice.
SAR 21,future SSW...etc.
counter-battery radar n counter-battery fire makes artillery a highly ineffective application in modern warfare. Based on the incoming track plots, a modern counter-battery radar can easily pin point the artillery battery's location in a matter of minutes, hence nullifying even the tatics of firing and moving.Originally posted by OH-FF:Long range ballistics are proven to be very effective in modern warfare.
least of casualties to home side if they can get the coordinates of the enemy's location by probe or survellience
funny. the British thought the same once, a long time ago. They paid for that by losing singapore.Originally posted by nightzip:because in times of war, we dun actually need infantry, navy personnels...
what we need is to beef up the long and mid-range missles and guns so that we can fire far away.....to attack.![]()
You are not from arty are you? I consider counter-battery fire as the biggest problem with towed artillery (although those with APUs can offset some of the problems) in regards to displacement.Originally posted by Tango1:Hmm...nice gadget...pretty handy for our 21st Div. The issue that MINDEF didn't go into full detail about was the timing of getting the gun into action. Not as in getting the first shot out, but in camouflaging the gun, i.e. the "action front" timing. To add to that, how long does it take to "cease fire" the gun and have it ready for airlift - crew, equiment and ammo included?
The only good thing about this gun is the mobility and weight. However, once it is deployed on the ground, it still requires a 5 or 7 ton to tow it away, or a Chinook to airlift it, since its SP status is quite limited. It is not exactly self-contained either; it still relies on an external source to deliver its ammo.
Other than that...I must admit that this gun increases the combat power of our RDF.![]()
Hahaha!Originally posted by dragonstar:You are not from arty are you? I consider counter-battery fire as the biggest problem with towed artillery (although those with APUs can offset some of the problems) in regards to displacement.
Originally posted by lionnoisy:Seems like MINDEF trying to see what the reactions of the neighbours and other defence industries are...Release limited info
[b]some new info from ZAO BAOZAO BAO 29.10.2005.
1.Pegasus shift center of gravity by see saw principal.What is it?
2. 23SA will be full operational capacity in one year and equipped with 18 Pegasus then.
3.All shell of SA will be 155mm after French 105mm replaced.
4.It is also called Camel for its interesting shape.
5.About 4000 shells have been fired in the past 3 years.21 times were fired here,7 times in S Afraica,in extreme weather of minus 40 C.
[/b]
The recoil of the Pegasus is a third lower than conventional 155mm howitzers.and is much lighter.
Originally posted by lionnoisy:What thing is called Camel?
[b]some new info from ZAO BAOZAO BAO 29.10.2005.
1.Pegasus shift center of gravity by see saw principal.What is it?
2. 23SA will be full operational capacity in one year and equipped with 18 Pegasus then.
3.All shell of SA will be 155mm after French 105mm replaced.
4.It is also called Camel for its interesting shape.
5.About 4000 shells have been fired in the past 3 years.21 times were fired here,7 times in S Afraica,in extreme weather of minus 40 C.
[/b]
Armoured version? U serious? I dun mind the idea, but...Originally posted by lionnoisy:1.How SA tested the new gun in this red tiny dot?
2.The armoured Light Weight Howitzer (SLWH) Pegasus is almost for sure under
development.It took almost ten year from FH 2000 to Primus to develop.
However,with the experience in Primus and the features of Pegasus,I think
the armoured Pegasus can roll out in 6 years.
TAKE NOTE the new gun and is much lighter.
I wonder if the armoured version can be heli portable.