yesOriginally posted by Lance_han:are u cat 1 qualified? if not STFU![]()
sori, cat 9 personnel onli, so u still should jus stfuOriginally posted by SMAPLionHeart:yes
i cat 1,2,3,4,5,6 qualified
according to smappy rulesOriginally posted by Lance_han:sori, cat 9 personnel onli, so u still should jus stfu![]()
Neither is there a CAT 9 in SAF.Originally posted by Obersturmfuhrer:Smappy rules dun apply to SAF. This not your father's army.
Simple answer that !!! You think in engineering when they talk about cars , they get a merc or a toyota to learn ?Originally posted by SMAPLionHeart:Government gave away F-16 A/B to Thailand , and give A4-SU to tertiary institutions?
Shouldn't our own students deserve better?
you've not seen japanese polys.Originally posted by storywolf:Simple answer that !!! You think in engineering when they talk about cars , they get a merc or a toyota to learn ?
...Originally posted by fkh:A4SU is very old plane compared to F16
A4SU are not flyable by today standards.
However, F16A/B is still flyable, and used for air interception role , therefore why must it be dismantled and used for research and engineering by Poly students?
You sure?Originally posted by fkh:A4SU is very old plane compared to F16
A4SU are not flyable by today standards.
However, F16A/B is still flyable, and used for air interception role , therefore why must it be dismantled and used for research and engineering by Poly students?
Says who? Our A-4s are very good at ground-attack even in today's standards. Being smaller and more manoverable is a also an added advantage. The A-4SU is a match even with Tornadoes.Originally posted by fkh:A4SU is very old plane compared to F16
A4SU are not flyable by today standards.
However, F16A/B is still flyable, and used for air interception role , therefore why must it be dismantled and used for research and engineering by Poly students?