Nowadays, people use GSM network, 99.9% coverage, with autoroam.Originally posted by I-like-flings(m):wah lau.. Sispec and OCS never teach how to water proof nowadays ar?![]()
go oversea excerise how? no reception.Originally posted by ditzy:Nowadays, people use GSM network, 99.9% coverage, with autoroam.![]()
i never know that a signal set is also bullet proof.Originally posted by tvdog:Rain cats and dogs no problem.
Though I have never done river crossing with signal set, I think it is quite waterproof.
I was a infantry platoon runner using the old PRC-77 set and during ops even through swampy area we were never told to "waterproof" our radiosets.
If going into water with a radioset will disable it then I think we'll be in very deep trouble.
This 40-year old radioset is so tough. It weighs 12kg and a spare battery weighs 2 kg. So the total load is 14kg, more than a GPMG.
Once I was really tired and frustrated after a day of carrying this chunk of scrap metal on my back and running around all day. When i got back to the bunk, I threw this beast down onto the floor and then kicked it across the room. Afterwards it continued to work no problem.
I think it'll stop a GPMG bullet.
boh liao la. ever heard of the 900 series???Originally posted by tankee1981:The old PRC-77 is indeed a killer! Its very heavy if you compare it with modern ones. But looks like all the weight is necessary as it is a military radio and is meant to take a lot of physical abuse. I think it make little sense to get a smaller, lighter and more sophisticated radio which breaks down easily and cost much more. Imagine the face of the signaller who have to sign 1206 often for this 'state of the art' new radio! Any info on the signal sets which we are using now? Hopefully we are still not using the PRC-77!![]()
Which btw, is heavier then the old PRC 77s.Originally posted by knnb:boh liao la. ever heard of the 900 series???![]()
yup you are right, it god's gift. actually it's quite reliable. and there is also a GPS function and the channel set is more than 940.Originally posted by nomood:Which btw, is heavier then the old PRC 77s.
When I was ording though, they had PRC-940 alpha (not sure about the name) sets coming in though. Smaller and lighter, god's gift to signallers. But it didnt' seem to work as reliably as the 940, or maybe it was just new to us. DIdn't have as many knobs as well, so rather then clicking dials on the set configuration was done through pressing buttons.