I know that someone's bought a T-38 before, but I'm not sure what the rule is for an armed aircraft like an F-5A. Based upon civilian ownership of disarmed WW2 fighters, it may be allowable.Originally posted by sgFish:are civillians allowed to buy them? i don't mind an F-5A in my backyard![]()
Well, you can fly those F5As as target aircraft....... for a AAM LF.Originally posted by Shotgun:Eh, why don't we all buy one of those F-5As each? Then we can start our own militia air force. SgMilitia
I think we'd have a pretty good squadron leh! =D
Same number of hardpoints the F-16A of the time had: 5, plus two wingtips. However, the max payload of the F-16 was 20,450 lbs, while the F-20 was rated at 8,300 (possibly up to 9,000) pounds.Originally posted by huaichien:Does anyone knows how many hardpoints the F20 has? If its the same as the F5, then its pretty limited.
Ah, that I'm not that interested. I don't think the F-5A stands a chance against a modern AAM. Heck, look at the python5, 2-hit opportunity... wat the hell?Originally posted by spencer99:Well, you can fly those F5As as target aircraft....... for a AAM LF.
I thought F16 has 7 hardpoints + 2 more on wingtips?Originally posted by Gedanken:Same number of hardpoints the F-16A of the time had: 5, plus two wingtips. However, the max payload of the F-16 was 20,450 lbs, while the F-20 was rated at 8,300 (possibly up to 9,000) pounds.
The other thing to consider, of course, is avionics. The F-20 was tested with Sidewinders, Sparrows and Mavericks, but there's no mention of compatibility with other weapons.
Ohh??? You'll be surprised, my dear......Originally posted by Shotgun:Ah, that I'm not that interested. I don't think the F-5A stands a chance against a modern AAM. Heck, look at the python5, 2-hit opportunity... wat the hell?