The reflectors are already mounted. Check out ST's closeup picture of Adm Teo at the bridge. The one with the word Formidable. On the upper left of the pic there is a strange angled piece of metalOriginally posted by tripwire:i wonder... will the malaysian navy send their warship to check check see see if their radar can detect the formidable.
they probably have all the various ships, ground radars and planes line up along the entire melaka strait, waiting for the arrival of the formidable.
but then... if i am not wrong... the formidable was escorted by at least one of our MCVs during the passage throught the straits... probably to mask the formidable's radar signature by sailing side by side..
once they the formidable is in dock... i think they will add some "radar reflective" attachments to fool our potential enemy into thinking that our stealth ship... isnt really so stealth.
its useful in times of peace to mislead.... in times of war... then they will be surprised...
if i am the commander of RSN... i would do that... no point flaunting our stealth capabilities.. unless we really really need to give them a fright.![]()
Radar reflector performance is a direct function of size, proportional to the fourth power of its linear size. Doubling a reflector's size increases its effective area 16 times.fr http://www.tri-lens.com/practical_sailor.txt
reflectors could also be a "safety feature" in aid of navigation, to ensure that the frigate appear as a large blip on the merchant ships' radar...Originally posted by touchstone_2000:The reflectors are already mounted. Check out ST's closeup picture of Adm Teo at the bridge. The one with the word Formidable. On the upper left of the pic there is a strange angled piece of metal
remember the time when the Victory class MCVs first appeared..?? they have such "clean" lines... but then after a while all sorts of sensors and gadgets start popping up all over the place.Originally posted by tripwire:well... for a start.. from the photo alone.. you will realise that the formidable is not only smaller and shorter, but it also has a lower superstructure compare to the french version... i think its trying to mimick the visby's low silouette design.
secondly.. the upper half slopping of the formidable mimicks the visby slopping which is all the way to the tip of the bow.. unlike the french ship, their upper slopiing is about 10 meters short of the bow on both sides.
lastly... french frigate radars and lots of other gadgets are exposed all over the top of their ship... while the formidables are either enclosed or shielded or simply not visible.
that's my prelimary opinion.
A pickup truck, for example, with its flat surfaces and sharp edges has an RCS of approximately 200 sq m, but a smooth-edged fighter jet has an RCS of only 2 to 4 sq m. The RCS of any given object, however, differs at various angles and radar frequencies. Much about stealth technology remains classified, but among the antidetection techniques used in the U.S. Air Force F-117 Stealth fighter plane (which probably has an RCS of 1 sq m or less) are a low profile with no flat surfaces to reflect radar directly back,fr http://www.bartleby.com/65/st/stealtht.html
Typical head on Radar echo at microwave frequenciesby Wg Cdr V Kumar (retd)
OBJECT RCS (sq. mts.)
35000 ton frigate.........10000-30000
Pick up truck................. 200
Automobile....................100
Jumbo jet airliner...........100
Large bomber................40
Cabin cruiser boat.........10
Large fighter aircraft.......5
Small fighter aircraft.......3
Adult male......................1
Bird ...........................0.01
Insect ....................0.00001
Originally posted by lionnoisy:lionnoisy , you belived the above data ?
by Wg Cdr V Kumar (retd)
fr http://www.pcquest.com/content/technology/102101208.asp
Typical head on Radar echo at microwave frequencies
OBJECT RCS (sq. mts.)
35000 ton frigate.........10000-30000
Pick up truck................. 200
Automobile....................100
Jumbo jet airliner...........100
Large bomber................40
Cabin cruiser boat.........10
Large fighter aircraft.......5
Small fighter aircraft.......3
Adult male......................1
Bird ...........................0.01
Insect ....................0.00001
RCS depends on three factors:There are many info on the net.Among them.
Geometric cross section,Reflectivity,Directivity
A pickup truck, for example, with its flat surfaces and sharp edges has an RCS of approximately 200 sq m, but a smooth-edged fighter jet has an RCS of only 2 to 4 sq m. The RCS of any given object, however, differs at various angles and radar frequencies. Much about stealth technology remains classified, but among the antidetection techniques used in the U.S. Air Force F-117 Stealth fighter plane (which probably has an RCS of 1 sq m or less) are a low profile with no flat surfaces to reflect radar directly back, the intensive substitution of radar opaque composites in place of metals,.......fr http://www.bartleby.com/65/st/stealtht.html
fr the above aerospaceweb link.the last is aircraft carrier.
.
The side of the turret should be sloped at the same angle as the edge of the deck.Originally posted by spencer99:could be perspective.....
the bridge look lower because the area in front of the bridge (with the Aster VLS) is protruding up a a level higher then the main deck....
it is not a "handsome" ship, but it looks purposeful and hi-tech..... hopefully, it is steathly lor.... :-)