look like a toyOriginally posted by tripwire:
ok.... guys... the ships are back... and this is one of the best photo of the formidable...
now... the question... any serious military nuts out there can tell me if those 2 mounted racks on both side of the aster launchers are MISSILES or CHAFF launchers?
Wrong position for SAM or optronicsOriginally posted by tripwire:
ok.... guys... the ships are back... and this is one of the best photo of the formidable...
now... the question... any serious military nuts out there can tell me if those 2 mounted racks on both side of the aster launchers are MISSILES or CHAFF launchers?
Communications--ST (Elect) CET Integrated
Communications System
Standard Operating Common Consoles......ST (Elect) SES
Chaff launchers...French originsOriginally posted by tripwire:
ok.... guys... the ships are back... and this is one of the best photo of the formidable...
now... the question... any serious military nuts out there can tell me if those 2 mounted racks on both side of the aster launchers are MISSILES or CHAFF launchers?
RSS Formidable ..shape and the use of special paintsSTimes 06.08.2005
and building materials ...appear no larger than a fishing boat
on enemy radar
Originally posted by lionnoisy:i think the french frigate captain means his lafayette frigate has an RCS of 10% of a similar size UNSTLEATH ship.
[b]Looks smaller than 10% in radar
I have posted in other threads that Formidable class will appear smaller than
ten % in enemy's radar.It is hinted by The Captain of France
FRIGATE ACONITE while the ship visited Sg.
2.Confirmation.
STimes 06.08.2005
I hope they means the fishing boat not more than 15m.
I read fr ST sometimes back that Sg invented a paint which
can reduce the temperature of naval ship by at least few degree.
Any more info on this 'cooling paint'?
3.The EW system is missing
MINDEF off course will not reveal the Electronic Warfare System!
Eg how to create a protection shield against income missiles.
Or better direct the incoming missiles back to enemy platforms!!
It has been and will be a closed guarded secrets.Remember Minister Teo
complained :while he was a Captain of a naval ship,he also could not
enter a locked room full of equipments.What were inside,u tell me!!
[/b]
Originally posted by lionnoisy:Please be so kind to supply the link / the source for this story .
[b]
3.[b]The EW system is missing
It has been and will be a closed guarded secrets.Remember Minister Teo
complained :while he was a Captain of a naval ship,he also could not
enter a locked room full of equipments.What were inside,u tell me!!
[/b]
the color is for aerial visual, not for level-visualOriginally posted by sbst275:Stealth... And I think pirates would find the colour of the frigate weird
Originally posted by sgboy2004:the color is for aerial visual, not for level-visual
If any pirates did, it would be a swift and violent death for them...Originally posted by nismoS132:i wonder if any pirates tried to board the ship while on it's way back![]()
![]()
But the Swedes are in the lead, with the Visby CORVETTE.
It is constructed almost entirely of carbon fibre, the same material used to make the chassis of Formula One cars and the hulls of racing yachts.
Its angular design gives it a minimal radar signature, known as a cross-section, and its 57mm cannon can also be retracted to reduce it still further.
John Nilsson, one of the designers, told BBC News Online: "We are able to reduce the radar cross section by 99%. That doesn't mean it's 99% invisible, it means that we have reduced its detection range."
In a nutshell, if the Visby was 100km from an enemy vessel it could see the enemy on its radar but not vice versa. It could get within 30km of the enemy before being spotted.
Originally posted by lionnoisy:well... for a start.. from the photo alone.. you will realise that the formidable is not only smaller and shorter, but it also has a lower superstructure compare to the french version... i think its trying to mimick the visby's low silouette design.
Another missing system is Counter measures :
The shipÂ’s electronic countermeasures/support measures system which performs radar warning and jamming.
Decoys include launchers for chaff and infrared flares and torpedo decoy system .
There are many references fr under Destroyers_and_Frigates.
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/#Destroyers_and_Frigates
2.[b]Any info of Formidable class counter measures fr open sources?
3.Aim at 1% RCS?
[/b]
fr http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3724219.stm
through http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stealth_ship
Our learned fren here has predicted Formidable reflects only 5% RCS.
I hope he is right.[/b]
According to Clark, one of the most critical capabilities DD(X) will have is a 50-fold radar cross section reduction compared to the current class of destroyer. Clark clearly spelled out what advantage this will bring to the battlespace.by CNO,US Navy.
Figure 1 illustrates and relates acoustic, radar, IR, and electro-optical signatures of submarines and surface ships to regions and design aspects of the ship that are most prominent in controlling those signaturesfrhttp://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/2002/mil-02-03-wavelengths01.htm[/b]
Figure 2 illustrates the relative radiated-noise reduction achieved in submarines and surface ships since 1960
Figure 3 illustrates the relative nominal reduction in surface ship RCS and IR signatures for most classes of surface ships since 1960