Originally posted by googoomuck:Asshole! What do you mean when you said that my statement is a fallacy?
If you've read this third post, you must feel that you have to stand up to explain why you are lousy in Mandarin. Don't shame your ancestors.
ooooh..., what gives? losing the plot? or did i touch on a raw nerve? or both?
we got an apeshit on the loose here.
1. to be absolutely clear, i am chinese, and like you, i learnt chinese in school. i hope that clears the air although i hate to have to be this explicit to someone for the person to understand. distinction i may not have in my `o' and `a', but as i said, it is sufficient to plant me in places like shenyang, xiamen or beijing amongst others to talk business with the china-men and have drink & chat with them.
2. i may have erred in the word use of `mandarin' and `chinese' in an earlier post, but you are clutching on straws if you think you digress and tap dance away from the original point i am raising and try to smokescreen your way out. and of course, the more you digress, the more shit is on you. this is an arse* though, and everyone has one as you implied.
3. i have stated that your conclusion doesn't support the premise you put out, hence your statement is a fallacy. it can be dissected to be proven so if one learns the topic of logic, but it needn't be so because your statement of error is quite stark. i also mentioned that you will be smart enuf to know it already or too dumb to understand. i think i can conclude the latter now. and as i said originally, there is no malice in my original 4-5 words sentence. why you would like to pick a fight out of that is puzzling. but bring it on...
4. isn't your statement `i am not a banana man' self-inflicted? why get work-up on something you confirmed yourself? not to mention it is very classless of you to barge on another topic and throw your tantrum there. in the first place, are you the only `no banana man' in this forum? are you so cock sure that i directed it to you?
great weather today. i am off teeing at the nearby course shortly. i will be sure to dedicate `no banana' #19, i mean hole #19 to you once there.
p.s. interestingly, my chinaman mate from shanghai who (also) migrated taught me a new phase yesterday over yum cha... "kangaroo loose in a top paddock". i didn't realize i can apply it so quickly to you.
*arse = opinion
Originally posted by googoomuck:Asshole! What do you mean when you said that my statement is a fallacy?
If you've read this third post, you must feel that you have to stand up to explain why you are lousy in Mandarin. Don't shame your ancestors.
no banana-man,
to be fair to you, let me reveal a little bit of myself so you don't embarrass yourself further with your presumption in your posts...i spent my life in singapore, only 1 year down under(so far).
laffs at angel7030 after claimin to be 16-21 of age.
Originally posted by redDUST:
ooooh..., what gives? losing the plot? or did i touch on a raw nerve? or both?we got an apeshit on the loose here.
1. to be absolutely clear, i am chinese, and like you, i learnt chinese in school. i hope that clears the air although i hate to have to be this explicit to someone for the person to understand. distinction i may not have in my `o' and `a', but as i said, it is sufficient to plant me in places like shenyang, xiamen or beijing amongst others to talk business with the china-men and have drink & chat with them.
2. i may have erred in the word use of `mandarin' and `chinese' in an earlier post, but you are clutching on straws if you think you digress and tap dance away from the original point i am raising and try to smokescreen your way out. and of course, the more you digress, the more shit is on you. this is an arse* though, and everyone has one as you implied.
3. i have stated that your conclusion doesn't support the premise you put out, hence your statement is a fallacy. it can be dissected to be proven so if one learns the topic of logic, but it needn't be so because your statement of error is quite stark. i also mentioned that you will be smart enuf to know it already or too dumb to understand. i think i can conclude the latter now. and as i said originally, there is no malice in my original 4-5 words sentence. why you would like to pick a fight out of that is puzzling. but bring it on...
4. isn't your statement `i am not a banana man' self-inflicted? why get work-up on something you confirmed yourself? not to mention it is very classless of you to barge on another topic and throw your tantrum there. in the first place, are you the only `no banana man' in this forum? are you so cock sure that i directed it to you?
great weather today. i am off teeing at the nearby course shortly. i will be sure to dedicate `no banana' #19, i mean hole #19 to you once there.
p.s. interestingly, my chinaman mate from shanghai who (also) migrated taught me a new phase yesterday over yum cha... "kangaroo loose in a top paddock". i didn't realize i can apply it so quickly to you.
*arse = opinion
Fuck lah, you know Chinese? You are a banana man!
For a chink who can write English but know nothing about Mandarin, you've lost your cultual identity and shame your ancestors. You are fit to smell the ang moh's shit!
BTW, do you 'speeching' English with a Birmingham accent?
You should bleach your skin. When are you going to bleach your skin?
Originally posted by whycannot:‘We migrated to spare our kid further misery with Chinese’
Her elder son is now working as an IT specialist in Brisbane and the younger one is doing his doctorate studies in mathematics at Oxford University.She said her elder son still feels bitter over his school experience.
‘
Wah!!! Imagine his son stay in Singapore and end up in ITE becos flunk of Chinese..
Now he is studying Doctorate in Oxford University and can compare himself to those Singapore scholar liao.. What a huge different~!
Originally posted by zenden9:
Wah!!! Imagine his son stay in Singapore and end up in ITE becos flunk of Chinese..Now he is studying Doctorate in Oxford University and can compare himself to those Singapore scholar liao.. What a huge different~!
Wah!!! do Doctorate in Oxford, but in Singapore can only do ITE. Really a big difference. din't know ITE standard higher than Oxford.
Originally posted by angel3070:Taiwan can already, no need japan.
We are all of hokkien blood.
Tan Kah Kee —"Henry Ford of Asia"
Your cheebye is of hokkien blood,okay? the rest may not be hokkien.
To put things simple,the reason our country will end up in such a dictatorial n "corrupted" state(bear in mind,only PAP ministers can corrupt),it is all becoz of our LKY's ego.
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:
Your cheebye is of hokkien blood,okay? the rest may not be hokkien.
I am talking about both Taiwan and Singapore's chinese population is majority hokkien.
But due to suppression of dialect, destruction of chinese schools, westernised education system etc by Lee Kuan Yew, the cultural morale in Singapore weakened, while Taiwan's is still strong.
Lee Kuan Yew is not chinese.
Lee Kuan Yew is peranakan pretending to be chinese.
Because if Lee Kuan Yew openly declares that he is not chinese and go and suppress dialects, destroy chinese schools, destroy culture etc, the dialect chinese would go and kill Lee Kuan Yew.
Is that all not true?
Originally posted by angel3070:I am talking about both Taiwan and Singapore's chinese population is majority hokkien.
But due to suppression of dialect, destruction of chinese schools, westernised education system etc by Lee Kuan Yew, the cultural morale in Singapore weakened, while Taiwan's is still strong.
Lee Kuan Yew is not chinese.
Lee Kuan Yew is peranakan pretending to be chinese.
Because if Lee Kuan Yew openly declares that he is not chinese and go and suppress dialects, destroy chinese schools, destroy culture etc, the dialect chinese would go and kill Lee Kuan Yew.
Is that all not true?
You are most welcome in teaching Science in Chinese if you can make the rest of the world understand the terminlogy.
Any subject with huge technicality is usually taught in English globally. When Malaysia proposed to teach science in Malay, there was a huge public debate on feasibility.
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:
You are most welcome in teaching Science in Chinese if you can make the rest of the world understand the terminlogy.Any subject with huge technicality is usually taught in English globally. When Malaysia proposed to teach science in Malay, there was a huge public debate on feasibility.
Can the "zwei-siao-pseudo-Bavarian-Hog" be serious with its own knowledge of language - when its expertise in history is already found to be leaky ?
For one who is "zwei-siao" enough to ignore "the anthropologically findings" (*1) -by those more expert then its "zwei-siao" self, it is amazing that the "zwei-siao-Hog" will stick out its "little Dickie" to honor the Malays as the inheritors of the Singapore soil; and now attempt to have the Malay language to be comparable with the Chinese "Mandarin" Language in the teaching of Science.
Before "Malay" even existed as a language form as we know it today, the Chinese language in its written form had existed in the milleniums since the B.C. periods.
The Chinese language had led to the discovery of alchemy, astrologies, the discovery of time leading to the first mechanical clock ever built, weapons of war, the compass, gun powder, naval vessels as big as modern ocean liners that allowed for the discovery of North and South America before Chritopher Columbus even "found" it.
China's scientific discoveries allowed her reach to be extended into the east and west coast of Africa, to reach the heart of Europe, and was reputed to have started the European Rennaissance.
If the Chinese language had posed a problem for scientific knowledge to be shared - how did the Europeans adopt the scientific discoveries that was introduced by the Chinese - who was said to have shared the Compass and the World Map as drawn by Admiral Cheng-Ho voyages around the globe - with this being documented by ‘Admiral Gavin Menzies’ (*2) ?
It will not be a surprise for the "zwei-siao-pseudo-Bavarian-Hog" to deny history, as in its stupendous efforts to even deny "the anthropologically documented origins of the Malay as being from Yunnan in China" (*3) - and of course its infamous ”zwei-siao-Truths” (*4) that it will disingeniously avoid.
Can a "zwei-siao-Hog" from a "Turd" World Country identified as "Turdistan" - know anything beyond its limited knowledge of everything ?
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:
You are most welcome in teaching Science in Chinese if you can make the rest of the world understand the terminlogy.
Why not?
Then Taiwan, PRC teach in what language?
Don't talk cock lah Herzog_Zwei.
You are chinese still talk like that.
Shame on you.
You are behaving like an anglo dog like Lee Kuan Yew.
I feel so disgusted with your views.
Herzog_Zwei, you give me this type of fucked up views, now I totally disillusioned with you already lah.
Still talk what cock come and tell me what teochew, in the end act like anglo dog.
Pui.
Originally posted by angel3070:Why not?
Then Taiwan, PRC teach in what language?
Don't talk cock lah Herzog_Zwei.
You are chinese still talk like that.
Shame on you.
You are behaving like an anglo dog like Lee Kuan Yew.
I feel so disgusted with your views.
Herzog_Zwei, you give me this type of fucked up views, now I totally disillusioned with you already lah.
Still talk what cock come and tell me what teochew, in the end act like anglo dog.
Pui.
End up, the doctors and professors have to write their thesis in English for world review and analysis. I do not behave like LKY but it is a true professional hazard of teaching in Chinese and ending up learning to write the thesis in English for global peer review. There is one of the reason why there are many Chinese professors who do not gain world recognition for their works In fact, the PRC and Taiwan ROC have different Chinese technical terms for the same subject have given me a huge translation headache at times.
In the past, the franca lingua for biology used to be Latin and the franca lingua for physics used to be German. In fact, once in a while I still use the german terms to convey my ideas to my fellow engineers due to the precision of the language.
Originally posted by Atobe:
Can the "zwei-siao-pseudo-Bavarian-Hog" be serious with its own knowledge of language - when its expertise in history is already found to be leaky ?
For one who is "zwei-siao" enough to ignore "the anthropologically findings" (*1) -by those more expert then its "zwei-siao" self, it is amazing that the "zwei-siao-Hog" will stick out its "little Dickie" to honor the Malays as the inheritors of the Singapore soil; and now attempt to have the Malay language to be comparable with the Chinese "Mandarin" Language in the teaching of Science.
Before "Malay" even existed as a language form as we know it today, the Chinese language in its written form had existed in the milleniums since the B.C. periods.
The Chinese language had led to the discovery of alchemy, astrologies, the discovery of time leading to the first mechanical clock ever built, weapons of war, the compass, gun powder, naval vessels as big as modern ocean liners that allowed for the discovery of North and South America before Chritopher Columbus even "found" it.
China's scientific discoveries allowed her reach to be extended into the east and west coast of Africa, to reach the heart of Europe, and was reputed to have started the European Rennaissance.
If the Chinese language had posed a problem for scientific knowledge to be shared - how did the Europeans adopt the scientific discoveries that was introduced by the Chinese - who was said to have shared the Compass and the World Map as drawn by Admiral Cheng-Ho voyages around the globe - with this being documented by ‘Admiral Gavin Menzies’ (*2) ?
It will not be a surprise for the "zwei-siao-pseudo-Bavarian-Hog" to deny history, as in its stupendous efforts to even deny "the anthropologically documented origins of the Malay as being from Yunnan in China" (*3) - and of course its infamous ”zwei-siao-Truths” (*4) that it will disingeniously avoid.
Can a "zwei-siao-Hog" from a "Turd" World Country identified as "Turdistan" - know anything beyond its limited knowledge of everything ?
Explain to me what is a "电å�万能表". Then explain to the world why did Einstein wrote his thesis in English when he is a german Jew. Then explain to me how come ATurdie have no brains to think and still type in English when it is Chinese Piglet Shit.
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:
End up, the doctors and professors have to write their thesis in English for world review and analysis. I do not behave like LKY but it is a true professional hazard of teaching in Chinese and ending up learning to write the thesis in English for global peer review. There is one of the reason why there are many Chinese professors who do not gain world recognition for their works In fact, the PRC and Taiwan ROC have different Chinese technical terms for the same subject have given me a huge translation headache at times.
For centuries, the Chinese Medical Fraternity practised their Eastern Tradtitional Medicines without the need to write any reviews and analysis to seek any approval from Western Medical Colleges, as the Chinese Medical Fraternity was THE Authority of Chinese Medicine themselves - why will the "zwei-siao-pseudo-Bavarian-HOG" think that the Chinese Medical Fraternity has to do so now ?
Did the Chinese begin to write their Traditional Art of Healing to seek approval from the Western Medical Fraternity ?
Or was the translation into English an effort to make the Chinese Traditional Art of Healing more accessible to the Western Medical Practitioners, and have them learn the mystique powers of accupunture that can allow major surgery to be conducted with anesthesia, and to bring life back to immobilised body of stroke victims ?
Can the Western Medical Practitioners be the peers of Chinese Traditional Medical Practitioners - when the Western Medicine knows zilch about the Chinese Traditions in medical practices ?
Only the inferior mind of a "Turd" World Citizen from "Turdistan" will behave as it does to become a pseudo-Bavarian HOG, when it is already a "zwei-siao-HOG".
In the past, the franca lingua for biology used to be Latin and the franca lingua for physics used to be German. In fact, once in a while I still use the german terms to convey my ideas to my fellow engineers due to the precision of the language.
The pseudo-Bavarian HOG will fail to even realise that the English Language has been evolving to absorb the various words from the languages spoken by the Dutch, the French, Germans, Swedes, and even the Spanish.
Is there anything remarkable to even speak the Germanic word even when as the pseudo-Bavarian HOG was led by its nose to "kindergarten" ?
The pseudo-Bavarian HOG must have been snag when it was "abseiling" clumsily in the SAF - to be stuck with the label as a "zwei-siao-HOG" for all the "angst" felt ?
Did it substitute the use of its precious pork fat and begin to use "diesel" to give itself the boost to achieve all that is needed for its "glitzy" performance ?
Perhaps it is better when it turn itself into a "hamburger" and wash it down with a pint of "lager", or it could pack everything into a "rucksack" to feed its "rottweiler" who will otherwise make the pseudo-Bavarian HOG into a "schmuck"
Was the "quartz" used in daily time keeping a word from the spoken language of the Swiss, or English or German ?
Is the ‘English Language so poor that a large portion of the language are loan from the German Language’ (*1) - or is it not due to the fact that the peoples of Europe and on the English Isle were in contact throughout the historical periods, which led to the flow of peoples and languages ?
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:Explain to me what is a "电å�万能表". Then explain to the world why did Einstein wrote his thesis in English when he is a german Jew. Then explain to me how come ATurdie have no brains to think and still type in English when it is Chinese Piglet Shit.
Any attempts to translate the stupidity of a determined "zwei-siao-HOG" - will be to confirm its stupendous "zwei-siao" idiocy in its pseudo-Bavarian form.
Can a "technical phrase of a scientific phase" written in Chinese be understood by a "Turd" from a "Turd" World Country of "Turdistan" - who will attempt to learn enough about the Chinese Language so as to degrade it to a level for a "Turd" to be able to grasp and understand ?
How did the "zwei-siao-pseudo-Bavarian-HOG" know that Einstein wrote his thesis in English, or was it another wild "zwei-siao" assumption from a "piggy's brain" ?
Albert Einstein maybe a Jew and born in Germany - was he a German Jew ?
Or did he not renounced his citizenship and moved to join his parents in Italy, and subsequently grew up in Switzerland where he joined a famous polytechnic in Berne - and to become famous for all the theories that he was reputed to have made with his mathematical genius ?
Was English the preferred language of education in Switzerland during the 19th Century, or was it not German and French - depending on which part of Switzerland that had the larger Swiss French, Swiss German, and Swiss Italian communities ?
It is quite obvious that the pseudo-Bavarian Hog had suck too hard on "little Dickie" so as to prevent itself from revealing its "oink" while in the Speaker's Corner, or else it will have to re-write all that it needs to express in its "Turd" language from its country of origin in "Turdistan" - which is a "Turd" world country.
As a "Turd" from a "Turd" World Country of "Turdistan" - it will see every foreigner as ‘ATurdie’ (*1) - as the resident "Turd" has been repeatedly trashed, stunned, and dazed for all the revelations exposed to its wanton "zwei-siao" ways as a "pseudo-Bavarian-zwei-siao-Hog".
Harry is still in control, Tommy is in semi-retirement - what are you doing with little Dickie still in your mouth ?
i am prepare to recieve any rebuttal
what's there to argue
we are all singaporean
so we must all unite and vote the right party
english is important due to fact that the ah moh aka white people were the one that dominate the world
last time they called prc - piglet (zhu zai) sell our ancestor to usa - san fracisco to dig gold
now it's china turn so chinese aka mandarin are crucial in term of trade = money
This Sumiko Tan is also one of the propagandists of Lee Kuan Yew.
http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/1824194
A loyal dog to the end.
‘We migrated to spare our kid further misery with Chinese’
Nothing but PAP fucking propaganda as usual.
Pui.
Everytime they decided on certain policies, they will mobilise all the propaganda machinery to keep on bombard public with propaganda to drill in the bullshit.
It's the same shit everytime.
Some naive people still come tell me state media is not propaganda tool of PAP govt.
hiaz.
Once you make such statements, can tell your level of political awareness already.
Originally posted by Atobe:
For centuries, the Chinese Medical Fraternity practised their Eastern Tradtitional Medicines without the need to write any reviews and analysis to seek any approval from Western Medical Colleges, as the Chinese Medical Fraternity was THE Authority of Chinese Medicine themselves - why will the "zwei-siao-pseudo-Bavarian-HOG" think that the Chinese Medical Fraternity has to do so now ?
Did the Chinese begin to write their Traditional Art of Healing to seek approval from the Western Medical Fraternity ?
Or was the translation into English an effort to make the Chinese Traditional Art of Healing more accessible to the Western Medical Practitioners, and have them learn the mystique powers of accupunture that can allow major surgery to be conducted with anesthesia, and to bring life back to immobilised body of stroke victims ?
Can the Western Medical Practitioners be the peers of Chinese Traditional Medical Practitioners - when the Western Medicine knows zilch about the Chinese Traditions in medical practices ?
Only the inferior mind of a "Turd" World Citizen from "Turdistan" will behave as it does to become a pseudo-Bavarian HOG, when it is already a "zwei-siao-HOG".
The pseudo-Bavarian HOG will fail to even realise that the English Language has been evolving to absorb the various words from the languages spoken by the Dutch, the French, Germans, Swedes, and even the Spanish.
Is there anything remarkable to even speak the Germanic word even when as the pseudo-Bavarian HOG was led by its nose to "kindergarten" ?
The pseudo-Bavarian HOG must have been snag when it was "abseiling" clumsily in the SAF - to be stuck with the label as a "zwei-siao-HOG" for all the "angst" felt ?
Did it substitute the use of its precious pork fat and begin to use "diesel" to give itself the boost to achieve all that is needed for its "glitzy" performance ?
Perhaps it is better when it turn itself into a "hamburger" and wash it down with a pint of "lager", or it could pack everything into a "rucksack" to feed its "rottweiler" who will otherwise make the pseudo-Bavarian HOG into a "schmuck"
Was the "quartz" used in daily time keeping a word from the spoken language of the Swiss, or English or German ?
Is the ‘English Language so poor that a large portion of the language are loan from the German Language’ (*1) - or is it not due to the fact that the peoples of Europe and on the English Isle were in contact throughout the historical periods, which led to the flow of peoples and languages ?
Any attempts to translate the stupidity of a determined "zwei-siao-HOG" - will be to confirm its stupendous "zwei-siao" idiocy in its pseudo-Bavarian form.
Can a "technical phrase of a scientific phase" written in Chinese be understood by a "Turd" from a "Turd" World Country of "Turdistan" - who will attempt to learn enough about the Chinese Language so as to degrade it to a level for a "Turd" to be able to grasp and understand ?
How did the "zwei-siao-pseudo-Bavarian-HOG" know that Einstein wrote his thesis in English, or was it another wild "zwei-siao" assumption from a "piggy's brain" ?
Albert Einstein maybe a Jew and born in Germany - was he a German Jew ?
Or did he not renounced his citizenship and moved to join his parents in Italy, and subsequently grew up in Switzerland where he joined a famous polytechnic in Berne - and to become famous for all the theories that he was reputed to have made with his mathematical genius ?
Was English the preferred language of education in Switzerland during the 19th Century, or was it not German and French - depending on which part of Switzerland that had the larger Swiss French, Swiss German, and Swiss Italian communities ?
It is quite obvious that the pseudo-Bavarian Hog had suck too hard on "little Dickie" so as to prevent itself from revealing its "oink" while in the Speaker's Corner, or else it will have to re-write all that it needs to express in its "Turd" language from its country of origin in "Turdistan" - which is a "Turd" world country.
As a "Turd" from a "Turd" World Country of "Turdistan" - it will see every foreigner as ‘ATurdie’ (*1) - as the resident "Turd" has been repeatedly trashed, stunned, and dazed for all the revelations exposed to its wanton "zwei-siao" ways as a "pseudo-Bavarian-zwei-siao-Hog".
Harry is still in control, Tommy is in semi-retirement - what are you doing with little Dickie still in your mouth ?
Yes, Harry is now in power, Tommy has left Singapore and what are you doing with CSJ's little Dickie in your mouth? Please, there are many other political options out there.
Originally posted by angel3070:This Sumiko Tan is also one of the propagandists of Lee Kuan Yew.
Lee Kuan Yew, the man and his ideas / Han Fook Kwang, Warren Fernandez, Sumiko Tan
http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/1824194
A loyal dog to the end.
You are a propaganda spinner for the SDP and not working for the people of Singapore.
You mean no one said anything to Mr Lee?
Wednesday, 02 December 2009
Chee Soon Juan
For
40 years, Singaporeans were forced to practice something that was
contrary to human nature and nobody said anything about it. I am, of
course, referring to Mr Lee Kuan Yew's recent confession that his
bilingual policy was wrong.
To be sure the surprise is not
that Mr Lee was wrong, for the Minister Mentor has been spectacularly
wrong on many occasions – the most embarrassing being his prediction
that Singapore was entering a "golden period" just months before the
economy crashed (see here).
What is surprising is that it has taken all this time for the
Government to realise this error when there was clear evidence, both
scientifically and politically, to demonstrate the inanity of Mr Lee's
policy.
I had written in a book that I co-authored with my
wife, Dr Huang Chihmei, that the English language is processed very
differently by the brain compared to Chinese.
I pointed out
that while English is based on the alphabet and read phonetically, the
Chinese language consists of characters which are recognised
pictorially. These languages are learnt through different neural
systems, involving different regions of the brain.
(The book, entitled Effective Parenting for the Asian Family,
was published in 1995 but its publisher Heinemann Asia inexplicably cut
short its shelf-life and got rid of the remaining copies.)
I
had also pointed out in letters to the Ministry of Education that was
published in the Straits Times Forum in 1993 as well as in my book Dare To Change that such brain functions are still developing in students.
Streaming children according to their language ability when these
neural systems have yet to mature is thus not a smart thing to do.
Nearly 20 years later, Mr Lee Kuan Yew cites his daughter's
neurological knowledge and finally admits that things have gone wrong.
Two major concerns arise: First, how many lives have been negatively
and unalterably affected by this policy? Many parents left Singapore
because they feared that their children could not cope in school under
this bilingual policy.
How many people had their educational
advancement curtailed because they were not able to master both
languages? In economic terms, how much talent have we missed out or
lost through the brain drain?
Second why, through all these
years, didn't any of the ministers point out to Mr Lee that he was
wrong? For decades all the ministers seemed to be in perfect agreement.
Were there no ministers, ministers of state, permanent
secretaries, etc at the Ministry of Education who detected the faulty
policy?
This is the tragedy of Singapore. Mr Lee's personal
experiences and ramblings often become diktat, and pass for
policy-making processes. And when policy is made, no one dares to
question it.
Are ministers paid so highly and intimidated so
thoroughly that no one thinks of saying anything to Mr Lee when
policies don't work? Is groupthink so prevalent within the cabinet?
Tragic as it is, the bilingual policy is not the most egregious as far
as PAP policies are concerned. Of much greater consequence is Mr Lee's
Stop-At-Two Policy and the Graduate Mothers Scheme. These were borne
out of a mixture of the MM's hopelessly poor grasp of what constituted
hereditary intelligence and his bigotry.
Women, especially
those at the lower end of the economic and educational scales, were
enticed and/or theatened into having their reproductive organs violated
in order to stop them from procreating during the years when the
Government was hellbent on keeping families small.
This helped to retard the national birthrate to the present extent that we, as a people, cannot replace ourselves.
Now Mr Lee insists that we need to import foreigners enmasse to make up
for the shortfall, never mind the social and economic consequences.
Again no debate, no discussion.
Again, all the ministers
seem to be perfectly in sync with their Mentor. Either that or
everyone's just waiting for Mr Lee's next confession.
http://www.yoursdp.org/index.php/news/singapore/3139-you-mean-no-one-said-anything-to-mr-lee
Lee Kuan Yew commited so many mistakes and errors in policy but no one in PAP dared to criticise Lee Kuan Yew.
We the people have to suffer for it.
PAP bastards then come and criticise us when their rubbish policies are at fault.
Originally posted by whycannot:‘We migrated to spare our kid further misery with Chinese’
By Kor Kian Beng from Straits Times, 27 November 2009
IN SEPTEMBER 1989, a Singaporean mother, Mrs Pauline Tan, wrote an impassioned letter to The Straits Times, criticising the way the Chinese language was taught in schools here and the impact it had on her nine-year-old son.
She said her son, then studying in Primary 3 at a Methodist school, was having suicidal thoughts because he hated having to study Chinese every day.
Wrote Mrs Tan: ‘He was constantly ridiculed and scolded by his Chinese teacher. He felt ashamed and shunned his classmates. He found Chinese boring. It is spelling, dictation, writing, tests and more spelling, dictation, writing and tests.’
As a result, she and her husband made plans to migrate to Australia. It was to spare her son further misery with the Chinese language, wrote Mrs Tan. The couple also have a younger son, who was aged five then.
Her letter sparked widespread criticisms, with many readers – especially those from the Chinese-educated community – lambasting her controversial move.
Many wrote in to express their anger over the Tans’ ‘absurd’ decision, and pointed out that Chinese-educated Singaporeans also had to overcome difficulties with the English language to compete with the English-educated for jobs.
One reader said: ‘At times, I find some English-educated Chinese Singaporeans too pampered.’
Some readers showed sympathy, saying the school and parents should have detected the problem earlier and done something to help the boy before he got into serious difficulties with the language.
For the next 20 years, there was no news about Mrs Tan and her family – until this week when she penned another letter to The Straits Times, which was published on Tuesday.
It was in response to Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew’s comments last week that the Government had made mistakes with the bilingual policy.
She wrote: ‘I am comforted that finally someone at this high level of government has come round to see my point of view, which I have voiced for a long time.’
She was also pleased with Mr Lee’s comments that the policy would be adjusted to suit students of different abilities.
Speaking to Insight on the phone from Brisbane, Mrs Tan, 60, said the family had obtained Australian permanent residency in 1990 but uprooted for Down Under only two years later.
That was because the couple wanted their elder son to complete his Primary School Leaving Examination here, and time to wind up the family business. She declined to specify the industry.
She had also harboured hopes that there might be changes to the education system after the publication of her letter – and after she contacted the Ministry of Education for help. But her elder son told her that the situation had barely improved in his school.
Mrs Tan acknowledged that the home environment was a key factor in determining a child’s interest towards the learning of any language. The couple were English-educated and spoke mostly English to the boys at home.
Still, she felt that the teaching style could have been less harsh, and the bilingual policy more flexible, to suit various types of students. ‘We definitely wouldn’t have migrated if the situation had been different,’ she said.
On the adverse reaction to her 1989 letter, Mrs Tan said that she was unperturbed by it.
She said: ‘I was just a voice saying the policy was wrong and that we should make changes. I wasn’t trying to make people follow my example.’
After all, it was not easy in the new land, as the couple encountered challenges like loneliness, she said.
The couple ran an export business, and later a property consultancy, until they retired two years ago.
But Mrs Tan said she felt she had made the right decision when she saw her sons enjoying and doing well in school again.
She declined to name her sons nor let Insight speak to them. The reason is that they are not aware that she had written to the press. She said only her husband knew about the Forum letters.
Both sons, aged 29 and 25, graduated from Queensland University of Technology and are doing well in life, said Mrs Tan.
Her elder son is now working as an IT specialist in Brisbane and the younger one is doing his doctorate studies in mathematics at Oxford University.
She said her elder son still feels bitter over his school experience.
‘When we returned to Singapore for visits, I would ask him at times if he wanted to visit his primary school. He did not want to go back there at all.’
Does the family plan to move back some day? Mrs Tan would only say that her sons now feel more Australian than Singaporean, though she still feels ‘deeply Singaporean’.
‘It’s such a pity that Singapore has lost some talented people as a result of some of its policies,’ she said. – ST
Republished from Straits Times, 27 November 2009
“Tyranny is worse than a Man-Eating Tiger”
“苛政猛於虎也”
天将é™�大任于斯人也,必先苦其心志,劳其ç‹éª¨ï¼Œé¥¿å…¶ä½“肤,空ä¹�其身,行拂乱其所为,所以动心å¿�性,增益其所ä¸�能 ...
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:Yes, Harry is now in power, Tommy has left Singapore and what are you doing with CSJ's little Dickie in your mouth? Please, there are many other political options out there.
'Tommy' or ‘Tommies’ ?
The ‘Tommies’ certainly left Singapore in the 1970s.
Are you sure 'Tommy' left with them permanently - when he had fought for Singapore's rights to Pedra Branca, and even chaired some public forums for 'Harry' recently ?
Are you sure you are not simply too embarrassed to reveal your infatuation with CSJ's 'little Dickie' to have it not only in your mind but out of your mouth so frequently ?
Are there any political options for a Turd from a Turd World Country of Turdistan, who is too embarrassed even not to want to know its own 'nationality' and 'country of origin' - and will be "zwei-siao" to be a "pseudo-Bavarian-HOG" ?
Originally posted by Atobe:
'Tommy' or ‘Tommies’ ?
The ‘Tommies’ certainly left Singapore in the 1970s.
Are you sure 'Tommy' left with them permanently - when he had fought for Singapore's rights to Pedra Branca, and even chaired some public forums for 'Harry' recently ?
Are you sure you are not simply too embarrassed to reveal your infatuation with CSJ's 'little Dickie' to have it not only in your mind but out of your mouth so frequently ?
Are there any political options for a Turd from a Turd World Country of Turdistan, who is too embarrassed even not to want to know its own 'nationality' and 'country of origin' - and will be "zwei-siao" to be a "pseudo-Bavarian-HOG" ?
Can you please quit sucking CSJ's little Dickie? Tommies have left the governance of Singapore to the government of Singapore, mind your own business and quit sticking your little Dickie in the business of the British.