Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
You think that alcohol, smoking and sex are morally objectionable? So why did you complain about the cleric when you yourself has an equally "holier than thou" attitude?
So why do you chastise people for decision making?
Why did you say that the women that took the short-cut asked the Clementi terror rapist to rape them?
You certainly don't make any sense.
You certainly have a distinct problem with basic comprehension. Coupled with your sordid ability to twist and turn when cornered, it seems laughable that you didn't take time to read my post in detail before attempting some form of an answer.
Did i 'ask' for some clementi terror to 'rape' women? Or did i question your clumsy comparison between 'taking short-cuts in Clementi' as opposed to taking a short-cut in JB?
Could your comparison be any further than comparing apples and oranges? Are Clementi streets predominantly poorly-lit as compared to JB? Is the crime rate in Clementi town exceedingly high when compared to a single district of JB, let alone the entire state of Johor?
I took you to task for your implications that people who take 'short-cuts' don't know better, when it is simply
HUMAN NATURE to do so and they do not deserve to be criticised for it. Surprisingly, instead of addressing my claims, you respond at a tangent to the topic and make baseless assumptions about my character.
I must have hit a raw nerve to have attracted such venom in your tirades.
Is it therefore surprising that you don't seem to be able to respond with an least an iota of wit, despite your clumsy attempts to debunk me? Is not the Muslim Cleric's prejudiced views mirroring your own when you imply people who 'short-cut' deserve the consequences? How else should we treat armchair critics who speak with the same 'holier than thou' attitude they label others with?
Do i 'fail to make any sense', or is 'ANDREW' unable to differentiate between the head from the tail?