maturity is deem on how you behave, not by age.................Originally posted by Texcoco II:Children (ie 18 to 21) act, work, play, behave, talk and think like young adults today. By 18 yrs, they are studying and practising concepts and subjects that adults usually are familiar with. Furthermore, 18 years old "children" or "boys" are drafted into National Service and perform adult tasks (like shooting a weapon and taking chargeable responsibilities). and oh yes..they are sexually mature, capable of giving birth...eG StandardChart Easisave bank account cannot accept depositers under 21. All those under 21 must go for "Children" account. I wanted to sigh up buy it's sounds wierd for a 19 years old guy to sigh up "Children" account...
And to add on, 16 years olds can engage in sexual intercourse, but in government's view not deemed matured enough to watch R(A) films? Does tat makes sense?
Anyway it's pretty pointless to call 18,19 or 20 years old as "children"?
Originally posted by Texcoco II:this one, hor, is by law, if you are not happy about it, next time, during GE elections, you go and contest for a seat, then hor, claiming for the rights of teenage, why can't WE AS TEENAGE, WATCH (R)A, then hor, when u are in the house hor, u propose to change the law of the age limitation.
And to add on, 16 years olds can engage in sexual intercourse, but in government's view not deemed matured enough to watch R(A) films? Does tat makes sense?
Anyway it's pretty pointless to call 18,19 or 20 years old as "children"?
[/b]
so do u want to lock all of them whom have do it before, if the law remain the law it is, 18 years old?are you referring to this sentence? if yes, i think you might have FORGOTTEN that i put the word, IF.
its not a crappy country, rules are there, so that people will not abuses it, i can only said one thing, have you start to earn your own keep, and have you serve finished your NS, if not, you will be still deemed as teenage,Originally posted by blue_crimson_89:it WAS 18 when i was a kid of like 6.. as i grew up, the "age" of being given the status of adulthood increased to 21.. crappy country..
amen to thatOriginally posted by LazerLordz:If we lower it to 18 as the official age for adulthood, and therefore citizenship, the govt can lose a sizeable number of youths for NS.![]()
upon reading this, poster really dunno english. it's SIGN up not SIGH up...Originally posted by Texcoco II:Children (ie 18 to 21) act, work, play, behave, talk and think like young adults today. By 18 yrs, they are studying and practising concepts and subjects that adults usually are familiar with. Furthermore, 18 years old "children" or "boys" are drafted into National Service and perform adult tasks (like shooting a weapon and taking chargeable responsibilities). and oh yes..they are sexually mature, capable of giving birth...eG StandardChart Easisave bank account cannot accept depositers under 21. All those under 21 must go for "Children" account. I wanted to sigh up buy it's sounds wierd for a 19 years old guy to sigh up "Children" account...
And to add on, 16 years olds can engage in sexual intercourse, but in government's view not deemed matured enough to watch R(A) films? Does tat makes sense?
Anyway it's pretty pointless to call 18,19 or 20 years old as "children"?
dota only meh? dun forget maplestory also lor... anyway, i also got play.... but is few months play once. it's the only place whr i can vent anger....Originally posted by Darkness_hacker99:My friends overseas at UK is 19 and sound adult. His perception is very mature too. Gosh. 19 in Singapore is just playing dota and shopping..![]()
Originally posted by allentyb:this one, hor, is by law, if you are not happy about it, next time, during GE elections, you go and contest for a seat, then hor, claiming for the rights of teenage, why can't WE AS TEENAGE, WATCH (R)A, then hor, when u are in the house hor, u propose to change the law of the age limitation.
THE GOD DAMN REASON WHY THE LAW HAS BEEN CHANGED TO 16 YEARS OLD, FOR ENGAGING IN SEXUAL INTERCOURSE, ALL U GOD DAMN TEENAGE HAS BEEN keep on DOING IT, so do u want to lock all of them whom have do it before, if the law remain the law it is, 18 years old?
Jesus christ, i think hor, the cinema theater refuse to let you in while attempting to watch (R)21 because u are UNDERAGE. so HOR
cheers
woah woah.... crappy country i agree... but more kiddos who talk big, act big n not action... when really being asked a question, give only stupid answers.Originally posted by blue_crimson_89:it WAS 18 when i was a kid of like 6.. as i grew up, the "age" of being given the status of adulthood increased to 21.. crappy country..
ya la.Originally posted by allentyb:maturity is deem on how you behave, not by age.................
About this, I once saw a debate show between people from the gov. and the sec sch students a few years back. A sec sch student asked that exact same question as you and do you know what they answered? They answered back by saying they believe that if the teenagers did not expose to pornography, the teenagers will not want to try to have sex.Originally posted by Texcoco II:And to add on, 16 years olds can engage in sexual intercourse, but in government's view not deemed matured enough to watch R(A) films? Does tat makes sense?
even a 12 yr old today wanna wanna try sex.. wad do u think? a 9 yr old can be raped by dad or step dad. wad u think?Originally posted by furb:About this, I once saw a debate show between people from the gov. and the sec sch students a few years back. A sec sch student asked that exact same question as you and do you know what they answered? They answered back by saying they believe that if the teenagers did not expose to pornography, the teenagers will not want to try to have sex.
Which I think might be quite true, however...![]()
Nonsense.....!!!!!!!!!!!Originally posted by furb:About this, I once saw a debate show between people from the gov. and the sec sch students a few years back. A sec sch student asked that exact same question as you and do you know what they answered? They answered back by saying they believe that if the teenagers did not expose to pornography, the teenagers will not want to try to have sex.
Which I think might be quite true, however...![]()
Statutory rapeOriginally posted by aHGer^83:even a 12 yr old today wanna wanna try sex.. wad do u think? a 9 yr old can be raped by dad or step dad. wad u think?
Im not amused by your lame remarksOriginally posted by aHGer^83:Originally posted by aHGer^83:18 = eighteen. got the word TEEN. so still not adult.. u dunno english always got hidden word de meh?![]()
Im not amused by your lame remarksOriginally posted by aHGer^83:18 = eighteen. got the word TEEN. so still not adult.. u dunno english always got hidden word de meh?
So u mean spelling error dictates how mature u r?Originally posted by aHGer^83:upon reading this, poster really dunno english. it's SIGN up not SIGH up...
in 3rd worl country, kids r required to handle such weapons lor.... u r such a kid man....![]()
if you can vote at that time, which means that you are 21 years old therefore you will have rights, but since you can't vote at that time, so why should the government give a damn to you, who is underage?Originally posted by jianfish9:I agree with TS here. When I enlisted, I was below 21. When I was a one-year soldier, I was below 21. When I ORD, I was also below 21.
I still remember when I was in camp listening to the progress package and I realised that I was not eligible for any of those because I was below 21. Yet, I was eligible to be court-martial, to be thrown into DB because I was supposed to be a mature responsible individual.
Perhaps they realised that no single NSF would be voting for a particular political party at that stage of time.
Apparently, the court of law only consider those below the age of 16 to be a juvenile and anyone committing a crime between 16 to 21 will be charged as an adult. Contradictory, Irony or Hypocrisy?
Btw, I still am not 21 yet and I think I have every right to demand that I enjoy the benefits of an adult.