Government really good. They had promised to provide affordable healthcare for all. Just puzzled, what all all those NKF and others doing when government already agreed to do so.Originally posted by LinYu:[b]
Hence his call to Singaporeans to give him and his team the strong mandate to:
* create opportunities for Singaporeans;
* give the young the best start;
* encourage every citizen to play a role;
* do more for lower income Singaporeans;
* help older Singaporeans to lead full and active lives; and
* provide affordable healthcare for all.
i only got a 100 from the progress package, thats about a 100 teh tarik(selling 70 cents per cup in a coffee house), well, i can tell you i'm a n extremely 'low income labourer', now what can i do about it?Originally posted by king108:Government really good. They had promised to provide affordable healthcare for all. Just puzzled, what all all those NKF and others doing when government already agreed to do so.![]()
Changi Prison only got coffee O.Originally posted by Lord Nuclear:i only got a 100 from the progress package, thats about a 100 teh tarik(selling 70 cents per cup in a coffee house), well, i can tell you i'm a n extremely 'low income labourer', now what can i do about it?
am wondering why or how much those cell mates got in changi prison?
they live in one-room flat, mostly.................
Can Hougang MP Low sue LKY for defamation ?Originally posted by hisoka:how many farking times are they gonig to show that piece o pap propoganda man!!
pap will just pass a law that say the mm cannot be sued even if it does get through. *shrugs*Originally posted by SG,LauBaiXing:Can Hougang MP Low sue LKY for defamation ?
LKY said Hougang MP Low T.K. will said "chen woo wu chi, kia la kai !"
Anyone can advise would it be the first loosing Lawsuit case of LKY heroically chapter.
Oh ! If they do that ? It will be the same as Malaysia to Honour the highly respected public figure with the title of "Tun".Originally posted by hisoka:pap will just pass a law that say the mm cannot be sued even if it does get through. *shrugs*
Originally posted by Blue Dolphin:
Dear Snow Leopard,
I am not too quick to directly linking a single party (the PAP) to destruction of a country. Suppose an opposition party wins this election and "completely wipe out" the PAP in the next and maintains a " complete stranglehold". Will that be good? Will you then champion the PAP?
well, at the rate things are going, i don't think the opposition could win the elections in another 200 years, let alone wipe out the wiper ...
I sincerely apologies if I belittle anyone in the post, it was not meant to be. I merely want to draw a distinction between having fun and doing something serious. Posting in this forum is fun, chosing a leader is serious.
no need to apologise, i wasn't offended. just to make it clear to you as well. posting maybe enjoyable but at the same time, we are serious about what we post.
I like again, to state my point, that save a few, opposition parties' candidates have no track record (at least the ones that show face so far). In my opinion, as an underdog, opposition candidates should have started preparing the ground for this election as far as five years ago. Never mind if he has no CEO post, he should build up grassroots work and champion those who cannot fight for themselves. Bring good to the needy and be examplary in conduct. Then, stand next to a PAP candidate during this election and win.
what i fear is that if you start going around making known to people your intentions to campaign five years later, you'd end up drinking kopi in ISD before the end of the year ...
Side track hor.... i think bringing up minister salaries and high cost of living is a lost cause. We have one of the highest standards of living, a low rate of cost increase and a bunch of damn good ministers. If Winston Churchill is alive today and we can pay to employ him, I would say, use the reserves. Money can only buy so much.....
not true. ministerial pay is too shamelessly high, always a point of contention. how can we have high standards of living yet at the same time we have our PM saying one of our top priorities is to help the 40 year old cope with joblessness, paying his elderly parents' medical expenses and children's school fees?
damn good (for nothing) ministers? if Winston Churchhill is alive today, he would say "never have so much owed by so few to so many ..."
From the way I see it, whoever steps into the opposition could just as easily be made a 'public enemy' since MM puts it ALL FAIR to DOWNPLAY the OPPOSITION and the RULING PARTY is controlling ALMOST the WHOLE of the GAHMENT and also a STRONG GRIP on SINGAPORE's SPEAK VIEWS.Originally posted by norey:The evident remarks by MM Lee shows the way he always beat an opponent by pointed arguments...this is his trait , he admit his ruthless pursuit to down a defeated opposition, so we sometimes follow such tactics,
However, in real life we must willing to forgive and forgets: such misdemeanour
only make us all animals = the fittest survive!
In Singapore even Mr. Lee Kuan Yew also affirmed there is no level playing field for opposition or left winger politicians: So they made the rules and decides whenever it fitted their fancies to change it.. This is the kind of high-handed minds of the garmen. The people: their rights? Forgotten lah!
Thus they accused their political opponents of “without talented people to serve”. Why should we suffered such intimidations and threats, Perhaps if you are talented and feel worthy enough to be called to serve your Country, please read my article on Tiger and join those worthy people to serve the Country by standing for the 2006 general election. If the garmen can field 24 young adult people among Singaporeans. I don’t see why others who are just as capable cannot step out to serve the Country.
The underlying reason is “fear” and who want to be thrown into the arena sacrificing all that they have?
I watched MM Lee on TV and was impressed by his demeanor and artistic mellowed & rationale explanations and then I asked myself: why cannot someone like him think in terms of eternity? And I marvel at the wisdom of the world without God, they have to be ruthless to be winners just like the fittest survive in this jungle of wild animals
The question is: would all Singaporeans perferred to be treated just as animals without such or any human dignity?
Seems like MM has done pretty much 'mistakes' of his own too...? But SERIOUSLY... With his OUTPLAY SWING of MANDATE in his hand, who dares to point and shoot at him like the way he did with the others...? Ultimately, I feel that he 'won' the debate not with REASONINGS but with this CONSTANTLY 'FEAR' factor DRIVEN in the people's HEADS....Originally posted by TooFree:I am afraid the crux of the issue does not lies in 'We' or 'I' that interviewed the odds. MM may have make a slight mistake there but that is certainly not the crux of their dialogue.
Reporter Ken indeed make an assumption based on the survey conducted, labelling the people interviewed 'fearful' of voting when in fact their take on the survey were only 'no comment' in nature. This was swiftly overturned by MM, before it get falsely broadcasted. Nothing wrong in my opinion.![]()
They've not been given adequate chances to learn that much... It's like comparing someone who learn to get his fishes from the river and someone who tries to catch fishes from the sea... The former is deprived of a chance to learn... Just like one who is not given a chance to go for major competitions... The gap would just widen...Originally posted by antoh:i feel Singaporean should think twice before making your votes.
If you say during the building of Singapore, i do agree with you MM Lee has done a good job so does Mr. Goh.
However I am not confident MM Lee's son, can take up a good job what his father did.
However at times, when i look at the Oppositions, their manifesto really makes me have a second thought.
They are still not as strong as PAP. if Oppositions are strong, why not we give it a shot
X 2. I agree that oppositions need not be there to replace the ruling party, but somehow the gap cannot be too gap between the ruling party and the oppositions... And we need an adequate 'force' around so that things could be questioned and stay in check... Not just to watch a 'fight' as MM has suggested... We could very well be watching 'fights' elsewhere...Originally posted by snow leopard:that's why we should all look upon the opposition not as a replacement to the govt but as a voice for us to prevent ourselves from being held ransom ...
until the election ends.Originally posted by hisoka:how many farking times are they gonig to show that piece o pap propoganda man!!
Thanks Linyu, U have a heart for the golden crowdOriginally posted by LinYu:what can use deduce from this dialogue?
that the government have lost touch with the populations especially the younger generations and even the older generations.![]()
![]()
![]()
huh?Originally posted by alien2:Thanks Linyu, U have a heart for the golden crowd
but norey has a point when he throw an injunction,
so please be carefully throwing out older generation
they made up 60 per cent of voters
besides ignorant or not they still vote for lightning!
filial respect is a word U folks never understood or practice!
However, he isn't voting, neither will he vote for Papa!
He's got some gluts to speak the truth about PAP openly and go to see his pic..
http://www.sgwiki.com/wiki/Alien_Own_User%27s_Page
U guys hide under a bush and peek out occasionally![]()
Just wondering U still in the dark?Originally posted by LinYu:huh?![]()
![]()
![]()